Public Policy: Heresy or Counterterrorism.
When it comes to rationality and decision making.
there are several approaches that can be applied.
Since the wake of the September 11, 2001 President.
Bush and his administration supposedly are making very.
impacting hardcore decisions that have been termed.
controversial. Public policy regarding.
counterterrorism is controversial hypocritical, but to.
what extent? Are the civil liberties and religious.
freedoms that have made the U.S.A a great nation under.
attack from foreign terrorists or is it simply a ploy.
from within to bring American to its knees. As a.
public policy analyst I will endeavor to excavate and.
evaluate some of these controversial questions,.
especially pertaining to the terrorist attacks of.
September 11,2001.
The first order of evaluation determines whether the.
organization or policy (in this case the Counsel on.
foreign Relations) is accomplishing its stated goals.
or objectives. Secondly, I will examine whether or not.
strategic plan is counterattacking its problems for.
which the policy was established.
The story of the destruction of the World Trade.
Center on September 11, 2001, does not begin on that.
day. It began shortly after WWI. After the war, Jesuit.
Edward Mandell House and Woodrow Wilson created the.
League of Nations. When U.S. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge.
Sr. kept America out of the League the Jesuits were.
furious. So, in 1921, under the influence of House, an.
organization was formed in the United States called.
the Council on Foreign Relations. (CFR).
This organization attracted people of power, wealth.
and influence. It enlisted politicians, people for the.
media, and big businessmen. The ultimate goal of the.
CFR was to break down all national boundaries and to.
establish a one-world government. Rear Admiral Chester.
Ward, a member of the CFR for 16 years, stated.
The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have.
one objective in .
common they want to bring about the surrender of the.
