The waste can also be easily contained in many areas. Canada is looking into proposed plans to store nuclear waste in thePre-Cambrian Canadian Shield? (McCarthy). There are also many other places that are uninhabitable to humans that are suitable for dumping the waste, such as Antarctica. .
Over time the nuclear waste can lose its radioactivity which makes it less dangerous. After only ten years the waste becomes 1,000 times less radioactive, and after 500 years thefission products? will be less radioactive than the uranium ore they were originally taken from (McCarthy). The waste is also not as abundant as would seem.Each year the UK produces 40 million cubic meters of industrial waste compared to 20 thousand cubic meters of nuclear waste? (Collum). The waste can also be reprocessed. During the reprocessing of nuclear waste, the plutonium created during nuclear fusion, which can also be used in nuclear reactors, is separated from the waste which leaves only three percent of the original waste left (Collum). Through these processes the containment and storage of nuclear waste can be done safely and efficiently.
Many critics say nuclear power plants are easy targets for terrorist attacks. If a nuclear power plant was bombed, the fallout from the explosion would contribute to the incidence of cancer all over the world (McCarthy). There is also the issue of waste being used to create weapons. The plutonium in nuclear waste could be extracted and used in nuclear weapons. The RBMK reactors built by the Russians were designed to operate as reactors and suppliers of plutonium for weapons (Keeny). This fault in design is the main reason that the plants failed to operate successfully. With so many countries on the brink of war, nuclear proliferation could become a real threat. If countries that support terrorist groups were able to build their own nuclear power plants, the terrorist would have access to a supply of plutonium, which would allow them to create deadly weapons.
A possible solution to this problem is through nuclear energy. ... Through nuclear energy breads many positives as well as negatives. ... Nuclear energy is the energy released by a nuclear reaction, either through fission or fusion. ... Nuclear power is one the safest methods of producing energy. ... The last negative affect of nuclear energy is waste disposal. ...
The image of nuclear energy as an unsafe technology still persists. ... In conclution, Nuclear energy should be used in Saint Lucie County over any other source of energy availible to you. A nuclear power plant produces far more amounts of energy than any other source of energy by far. ... Contrary to popular belief, nuclear plants are safe and enviromentally safe, unlike many other energy sources. ... Nuclear energy is safe, reliable, strong, efficient, and profitable!...
Today, we Americans get more electricity from nuclear energy than from any other source, except coal. In many states, nuclear energy is the leading source of electricity. ... Over 95 percent of our new electric supply since 1973 came from nuclear energy and coal. ... The good news is nuclear energy. ... Other nations have also discovered the environmental benefits of nuclear energy. ...
What is nuclear Power? Nuclear energy was first used in 1956. ... Nuclear fission is the process in which atoms are split and energy is released. ... This nuclear energy can be used to boil water, and give off steam. ... Some advantages of nuclear energy are; that it provides adequate heat, it efficiently produces large amounts of electricity (about 1000MW of electricity per day.) ...
Nuclear energy comes directly from atoms. ... All around the world, many places depend on nuclear energy for power. France actually gets 60 to 70 percent of its energy from nuclear power. ... As nuclear reactors produce energy, some are designed to produce new fuel. ... Nuclear energy just starts from a small atom. ...
Nuclear Energy During the early stages of nuclear power there were many accidents that resulted in several people's deaths and the destruction of millions of dollars of property. ... Also, the waste that comes from the production of nuclear energy is not suitable for making weapons. ... However, the total cost of nuclear energy is actually less than other sources of power. ... The energy invested in building a plant is paid back in five months (McCarthy).The basic fact about nuclear energy is that the input energy is 4.8 percent of the output energy? ... Nuclear fusion could supply coun...
Nuclear Energy During the early stages of nuclear power there were many accidents that resulted in several people's deaths and the destruction of millions of dollars of property. ... Also, the waste that comes from the production of nuclear energy is not suitable for making weapons. ... However, the total cost of nuclear energy is actually less than other sources of power. ... The energy invested in building a plant is paid back in five months (McCarthy).The basic fact about nuclear energy is that the input energy is 4.8 percent of the output energy? ... Nuclear fusion could supply coun...
One problem with nuclear energy is the radioactive waste. ... Nuclear energy is a quick and easy way to get electricity. ... I support the use of nuclear energy for the production of electricity because it is safe and anti-supporters have falsely shown the use of nuclear energy. ... Using nuclear energy properly can be safer than riding in a car. ... I persuade you to support the idea of nuclear energy. ...
Nuclear power, though, is a way that we can produce energy in our own country and we would have control. ... We've only gone upwards in the ways of using nuclear energy and will continue to progress everyday. Another argument in the question of whether we should still resort to nuclear energy is "Where will we put the nuclear waste?" ... By harnessing nuclear energy, we can power our entire world. ... By using nuclear energy, we would also not have to rely on foreign countries deciding how much we pay for this great necessity. ...
