The surrogate mother can be treated as not the mother of the baby. However, in my point of views, it is inherent in the pregnancy that the mother will develop an emotional relationship with the baby she bears. To force the surrogate mother to give up her child under the contract violates his human right to associate with and raise her child. Also, what would happen if the child was retarded or had physical problems requiring special medical expenses or care for the rest of his life. Would the couple refuse the child? If the couple refuses the child, even the court requires the parents to take care of the child. I believe that it is not good for the child. .
In addition, the properties of surrogate mother are quite similar to the adoption: The Child has no complete genetic relationship with the parents. Therefore, they should have similar dealings, but in reality, their situations are different. Firstly, laws prohibit the use of money in connection with adoptions but surrogacy allows the money flow. Secondly, laws requiring proof of parental unfitness or abandonment before termination of parental rights is ordered or an adoption is granted, but for surrogacy, the law has not clear definition how to terminate the parental rights of surrogate mother.
2. Surrogacy Ruin the surrogate mother dignity and right.
Society may also place a stigma on the surrogate mother for.
"Selling babies." Even though some surrogate mothers may do it for reasons other than money, they may still be branded as someone willing to sell their child for a price. This concept reduces women to becoming mere "vehicles" for producing offspring. Proponent may argue that point by personal freedom and choice. Our community and social structure guarantee these inalienable rights. People have rights to do anything with their bodies. It is not rational to make rules that restrict such contracts between well-informed and freely consenting adults.
