(855) 4-ESSAYS

Type a new keyword(s) and press Enter to search

Banning Of Lady Chatterley's Lover



             Though the First Amendment in the United States Constitution forbids Congress from enacting laws that would regulate speech or press, many states have passed laws in contradiction to the First Amendment. The First Amendment formally recognizes the right of Americans to think and speak freely. Under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act, everyone has the right of freedom of expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions and to receive and communicate information and ideas without inference by public authority and without boundaries. The Constitution under the First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press" therefore outlawing a national system of censorship, but under the Tariff Act (1930), "United States Customs has the power to seize any material that is being imported in into the country and that it feels might be obscene; it must then submit that material to a federal court in order for its obscenity, or otherwise, to be judicially determined" (Green 335). .
             While the U.S. Constitution protects the freedom of speech, "obscene" material has historically been excluded from First Amendment protection, which has led to the official banning of Lawrence's Lady Chatterley's Lover. "The pressure to conform to an external ideal dominated and not until into the 20th century did this repressive moral outlook cease to operate freely" (Weiner 99). Until the 1930s, the legal definition of obscenity in Britain and the United States was that of Lord Cockburn in the Hicklin Case (1968): "Printed materials are obscene if they have a tendency to deprave or corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences" (Weiner 99). But in 1973, during Miller v. California, the Court re-examined the issue and established a standard for determining whether material is obscene. "The Court ruled that material is legally obscene if: (1) the average person would conclude that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to prurient interests; (2) it depicts sexually explicit conduct, specifically defined by law, in a patently offensive manner; and (3) it lacks serious literary, artistic, political and scientific value.


Essays Related to Banning Of Lady Chatterley's Lover


Got a writing question? Ask our professional writer!
Submit My Question