Therefore "America in combating terrorism "should target nations, in this instance "Egyptian regime; that harbors terrorism by loosing control of its borders. .
Perhaps America and the Bush administration "outside of Osama Bin laden "had no idea of where they were going to continue their "war on terrorism-; as there are twenty-two Arab states. And terrorists "are Islamic extremists aggregating in the Middle Eastern and North African regions; devising plans to wreak terror in the lives of innocent people. .
America; has already focused a center of attention to Iraq and Afghanistan, by means of war "in the name of combating terrorism "and finding nuclear weapons of mass destruction. Now, a shift in interest must occur so that the U.S. can remain equally tactical "in remedying terrorism. Iraq and Afghanistan have been destroyed by the U.S. Military "and are now, undergoing total reconstruction. In fact, the U.S. has militarily defended its honor and ended Saddam Hussein's regime; that is, at least for now "as Saddam has not been captured, our "officially-, announced deceased. Now, U.S. foreign policy, defense, and national security issues in each of the twenty-two Arab states; has become increasingly important. Especially "in countries that possesses a vast number of "extremist- Islamic Militants, as Egypt does. .
The architecture of U.S. foreign policy, currently, in Egypt, is last in terms of mass public interest. However, since the most recent 911 terrorist attacks, U.S. foreign policies in countries such as Egypt are; of imminent strategic importance, which is vital in the mission to restore homeland security. In order to achieve this restoration, the United States should expand inquiries on intelligence in predominantly Arabian-Muslim-oriented various regions.
One step in examining potential threats, is determining whether or not nations pose a threat, and if so, is the threat direct or indirect? When assessing the Egypt, it is apparent that there military is no threat to U.
