To what extent are we the products of our experiences?.
To what are we the product of our experiences? Essentially, this is the nature V nurture argument that has plagued scientists for hundreds of years.
Are we intelligent because we inherited it or because we were reared in an intellectual stimulating environment.
In truth, we can never solely depend on just one to get us through life, as, we are, like it or not, a phenotype.
This means, fact, we are a mixture of our heredity and our environment. Even though, we cannot change our genes, we can however, physically and mentally change ourselves, because of our new environment.
For instance, if we had the gene for perfect sight, we might not actually have perfect sight, if we constantly are too near the T.V. or keep straining our eyes.
Another instance is the brain disease the brain disease, PKU that can lead to retard ness. But now, it is checked for at birth, and if it is detected, then the child is put on a special diet, and the baby can lead a relatively normal life.
So, if we are to fulfill our heredity blueprint, we need a suitable environment first.
But what if we had the suitable environment, but didn't have the genes? Would we then be able to fulfill our environmental obligations?.
Intelligence is one of the main issues here.
It is generally accepted that intelligence is related to both heredity and environment. Studies done on families, particularly among identical twins and adopted children, have shown that heredity is an important factor in determining intelligence; but they have also suggested that environment is a critical factor in determining the extent of its expression. For instance, children reared in orphanages or other environments that are comparatively unstimulating tend to show retarded intellectual development. In recent years, controversy regarding intelligence has centered primarily on how much of each factor, heredity and environment, is responsible for an individual's level of intelligence.
Is criminal behavior the result of nature or nurture? ... One of the most sought after questions today is whether criminal behavior is the result of nature or nurture. ... Although there is evidence supporting both sides in the nature v. nurture argument, most of it is in favor of nurture. ...
Nurturing Nurturing is how one cares for, tends to, and helps develop a person in order to benefit existing skills or traits. There are many different ways to nurture people. ... Nurturing to each other's needs is an everyday example of how the need to be nurtured is filled. ... One is the nurturer and the other is the one being nurtured. ... Self esteem is often higher in idividuals who are nurtured and take an active role in nurturing others needs. ...
Others argue it is a mixture of both nature and nurture that decides human similarities and differences. ... Nurture has a definite impact in certain matters. ... These examples prove that nurture does play a big role in how we develop and that the environment we live in, and what happens to us on a daily basis teaches us how to handle the various different situations life hands us. ... It is my belief that both nature and nurture together help shape human behavior. I believe that nature and nurture combined help us determine our path in life. ...
The debate of Nature vs Nurture and it's effects on society is not a new, hot philosophical topic. ... A culture oriented around nurture-based developmental theory undermines and essentially punishes those with a genetic handicap that is not visible. ... This also proves that nature and nurture will never go hand-in-hand one-hundred percent of the time, nor will it lean towards one or the other one-hundred percent of the time. For, in this example, nature is not involved at all in race and linguistics and it is only nurture that has an impact. The age-old philosophical debate of nature ...
Discussion Questions for Shakespeare's Henry V 1.Most of the criticism of this play centers on whether Hal has become a good person or a bad person. ... Falstaff dies offstage as a reminder that Henry V is a "sequel to the earlier histories of Henry IV." ... The presence of the tavern gang after Falstaff's death in the play represent the personal history of Henry V. This history brought into the play by Henry V "cannot be quite so easily banished." Because the tavern gang remains present in the play, the audience has a reminder of Henry V's personal past. 6. ...
"One of the most significant political figures of the sixteenth century, Charles V was emperor of the Holy Roman Empire" as well as a great portion of Europe (255 Bruccoli). ... Charles V continued to gain more land when his parental grandfather died in 1519 and he inherited the House of Australia and was later elected Holy Roman Emperor. ... Because Charles V was ruler over so much land, by claiming that he was chosen by god to rule, he was able to bring together his people with as little conflict as possible. The first example of Charles V claiming the Divine Right of Kings was when he b...
Henry V (1989) Directed by Kenneth Branagh Produced by Stephen Evans This is a film adaptation of a classic play that Shakespeare wrote early in his career. ... A young King Henry V played by Kenneth Branagh, (a well known Shakespearean filmmaker), has just ascended to the throne of England. ... Kenneth Branagh delivers this speech as Henry V; his words "We Few, We happy few, we band of brothers." stirs deep emotions not only among his subjects, but also among the viewers as well. ... With a budget of around ten million dollars, Henry V delivers over 2 hours of incredible histori...
Nurture can be used as two parts of speech, a noun or verb. ... Nurturing is a very important concept, because unlike some animals, human children must be nurtured for quite a number of years for survival and normal development. ... It was nurtured into me. ... His parents nurtured their children with more and more English. ... Nature vs. nurture should no longer be debated. ...
Charles V's failure to control the princes was the most significant factor in the spread of Lutheranism. ... The Edict was seldom enforced by the Princes and their public defiance of Charles V's order suggests Charles was in no way in control of the princes. ... This was the largest defiance against Charles V and proved Charles severe lack of control over the Lutheran princes. ... Although there are many occasions where Charles V failed to control the princes he did have some successes. ... Overall Charles V's failure to control the princes did result in the establishment of Lut...
