John Locke, and Thomas Hobbes, had very different opinions on people and on politics. John Locke believed that men were born free, are generally peaceful beings, and that they were capable of collaborative decision-making to ensure upholding their natural rights to life, liberty, and especially property. Thomas Hobbes on the other hand believed that men were selfish, were often at war with each other, and that they needed an absolute sovereign to uphold their natural rights, especially their right to life. Their philosophies serve as useful tools to analyzing current debates over such issues as smoking, and gun control. This essay will use the theories of Hobbes and Locke to explore the different sides of these two specific issues and will serve as a useful exercise in exploring the different thinking of these two philosophers.
Locke believed that people had natural rights and that they were capable of deciding what was best themselves. Since he thought that men were capable of making responsible choices, one could conclude that on the topic of smoking, Locke would say that smoking was a personal choice. However, he would probably also add that smoking should only take place in private since he believed that people could make their own choices and act upon them so long as they did not harm others. Since second hand smoke is known to be harmful, and because the non-smoker is not consenting, Locke would have been against the idea of public smoking due to its adverse affects on the rest of society. On the issue of having smoke-friendly or smoke-free establishments, Locke would probably leave it up to the property owner to decide since his theories show a strong support for the rights of the property owner, and because smoking in a privately owned space only affects those who choose to enter it. In addition, it is important to mention that Locke would say that the government should not make rules that deny the people the right of decision-making, which banning smoking would do.
Hobbes VS. ... Two of the more interesting theories are John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. ... Hobbes and Locke have two different ideas on human nature; however, Hobbes had the better understanding on human nature. ... There were two opposite views on natural rights, by Locke and Hobbes. ... Hobbes and Locke had different ideas on this, but Locke's ideas work the best. ...
Hobbes vs Locke Nowadays, especially after the terrorist acts on September 11, 2001 and the war in Iraq, terrorism is on-top issue discussion that turns the attention of the whole world. ... I would like to contemplate on this question by looking at the theories of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are two political philosophers; their theories were about the formation of the society and discussing the men in his natural state. ... Hobbes stated that there are the laws of nature which are dictated by the reason. ... Contrary to Thomas Hobbes, John Locke'...
This can be supported by the following case laws; Insurance Co. vs. ... Which support the idea of John Locke. ... John Locke's conceptions on the state of nature differed from those of Thomas Hobbes in that Locke proposed that "there can be a state of peaceful co-existence in a state of nature without necessarily having a form of government in place." ... To Thomas Hobbes, "A state of nature is a state of war" and not a state of peaceful co-existence as Locke puts it. ... How John Locke and Thomas Hobbes view the term "social contract" or government. ...
Hobbes Vs. ... Two prime examples of differences verses similarities in political philosophers is Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. ... The similarities of Hobbes and Locke are few but there are some equally between the two. ... Hobbes sees all men as evil, while Locke sees men as neither good nor bad. ... Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are great political philosophers with extremely different views. ...
Compare and contrast between Hobbes and Locke on their views of the natural conditions of man. ... With Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, one could certainly argue this point. ... In stark contrast to Locke, Hobbes sees the state of nature as complete hell. ... Like Hobbes, Locke believed that self-preservation of man is very important because of his right to life but Locke gave more consideration to the idea of revolution. ... While Hobbes may not be entirely right, his work still gave way to Locke and other phi...
Hobbes and Locke in our time Nowadays, especially after the terrorist acts on September 11, 2001 and the war in Iraq, terrorism is a top issue, that turns the attention of the whole world. ... I would like to analyze on this question by looking at the theories of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are two political philosophers; their theories were about the formation of the society and what the social contract means. ... Contrary to Hobbes, Locke says that humans know what is right and wrong. ... Conversely to Hobbes monarchial state, Locke contends that the g...
"And in him consisteth the essence of the commonwealth, which (to define it) is one person, of whose acts a great multitude, by mutual covenants one with another, have made themselves every one the author, to the end he may use the strength and means of them all, as he shall think expedient, for the...
Those who argue that the death penalty is an ethical way to deal with societies "bad seeds" often state that great American thinkers and leaders such as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Kant, Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Mill all supported the death penalty (Koch 324). ... After years of watching the ineffectiveness of determining who should be put to death, the Supreme Court in the1972 in the case of Furman vs. ... Edward Koch, the former mayor of New York from 1978 to 1989 and avid death penalty supporter, states that the discriminatory manner of the death...
"Daisy Miller: A Study" Henry James" "Daisy Miller: A Study" focuses on the complexity and ambiguity of the protagonist, Daisy. The "study" of Daisy Miller is composed of opposing positions and various viewpoints held by Daisy's acquaintances, namely Mr. Winterbourne. It is through these acquaintances, not through Daisy herself, that the reader is exposed to Daisy's character. The "study" therefore is, in a sense, the active participation of the reader to learn indirectly the character of Daisy Miller through the opinions of others who observe her within the plot. ...
