Bossuet understands the argument that could be made against Divine Right, such as the fact that the ruler could do whatever he pleased. It explains that a tyrant as well as "The prince who is useless for the people's good is punished ," (Bossuet, 144) will be punished as a way for the people to take comfort in that God will punish the leader who oppresses the people and the leader also the leader who does nothing with the power that has been bestowed upon them. Overall Bossuet embraces Divine Right, while putting the mind's of the people at ease.
In direct contrast to the idea of divine right comes Machiavelli, a diplomat for Florence who was later forced into exile. Embittered by this and compelled by the great love of his life-politics-he wrote The Prince. (Spielvogel, 234) The Prince's main points were the acquisition, maintenance, and expression of political power as means to restore and maintain order in his time. (Spielvogel, 234) His views contradicted the norm in which he chose to describe " how things are in real life and not waste time with a discussion of an imaginary world." (Spielvogel, 234) The imaginary world he is referring to is the more common theory that stressed the ethical aspect of a ruler's actions. Instead Machiavelli focuses on human nature and effects of the ruler's actions. Machiavelli establishes human nature as self-centered and says men will be devoted to you as long as you serve their interests. However " as soon as you need help, they turn against you," (Machiavelli, 244) illustrating their self-centered nature. To remedy this human flaw he explains that there are times to be feared and loved however it is safer to be feared. If the ruler is feared people tend to not cross them because they are afraid of recourse, at stated by Machiavelli. However if they are loved "Men are less nervous of offending," (Machivelli,244) because " love attaches men by ties of obligation since men are wicked, they break whenever their interests are at stake.