The Principle of the Indiscernibility of the Identicals is a property that is very important when we try to prove the validity of the arguments made by Descartes. It says that any two things that are identical have the exact same properties. Descartes uses this property to defend his argument of the mind and body. Descartes believes that since the mind and the body have different properties that they cannot be identical. He even goes as far as saying the mind is better off without the body because they body can somehow distort perceptions making thoughts unclear. .
Although Descartes" argument makes certain points, I find it very difficult to make any sense of it. I believe that the mind and the body are two separate things, but I disagree when Descartes says the mind can survive without the body. If you have one without the other both entities seem insignificant. The mind and the body together create a strong force that we call life. Yet, Descartes feels that the mind would be better off without the body. So, I ask this question: what is the purpose of having a mind with out a body? I have trouble understanding the significance of a mind that is only used for thinking, or more specifically, doubting. The body is like a medium; it is the center of experience. The body is what feeds the mind and gives it something to think about. Without the body, the mind is essentially empty. Therefore, the existence of a mind without a body is pointless. .
The Principle of the Indiscernibility of Identicals can make a lot of sense if you look at it on a very simple level. But there is a more complicated level of thinking that takes away from the validity of the principle. People may lack certain knowledge that makes this principle invalid. If you take two objects, say a book and a chair, you can see by using the Principle of the Indiscernibility of Identicals that the two thing are not identical therefore they do not have the same properties.
Descartes' proof of the existence of God occurs in the Third Meditation. ... Now Descartes has established the rules by which to lay down his argument. ... Descartes determines that such an idea must have a formal reality, a cause. ... Descartes then makes the point that he has the idea of "infinite- describing God. ... Therefore, Descartes concludes that God necessarily exists. ...
Descartes first looks at the senses. ... (Descartes). ... Descartes affirms his existence every time he thinks, doubts, or is persuaded (Descartes). Descartes affirms that if there is an Evil Deceiver then Descartes must exist because in order for God to deceive, Descartes he must first exist. ... These two ideas, Descartes cannot account for. ...
(Rene Descartes, Meditation I) Descartes" Mediations combined equal the embodiment of an effort to establish a foundation for knowledge. ... Descartes points out the fallibility of the senses, for they often deceive. ... (Rene Descartes, Meditation I) With his senses stripped and the acknowledgement that God is in fact an "evil genius," Descartes searches for that which he can rely on. ... (Rene Descartes, Meditation II) This portion of Descartes" argument proves to be an important rung on the ladder, for it establishes the one thing that Descartes believes to be plausible. ......
Descartes and his Deamon Everyday we are bombarded with various forms of stimuli. ... Would this make Descartes nonexistent as well as his body and mind? ... And believe can only exist in the mind, according to Descartes. ... Perhaps he deceives Descartes about everything else. ... But it is possible that the evil demon of Descartes is our own beloved mind. ...
Descartes" Meditations In his second meditation, Rene Descartes reveals and tries to verify the proposition "I am thinking, so I exist". ... Descartes argues that this is what makes one's own existence indubitable. ... On the other hand, the proposition, "I am walking, so I exist", would be considered dubitable by Descartes" prescribed rationale. ... Descartes uses his meditations to demonstrate the importance of foundational beliefs, for they are all one can be truly certain of. ... The proposition "I am thinking, so I exist" would be considered a piece of knowledge that we c...
On the other hand, Descartes was a Sceptic. ... (Descartes, 1980 ). ... Lastly Descartes argued that certainty is a state of consciousness which is subjective. ... The doors of studying the mind (Psychology) were opened by Descartes. Prior to Descartes, the mind was viewed as the puppeteer of the body. ...
Descartes set out to find and isolate in his mind those things which he could doubt even to the tiniest degree. ... For Descartes, one of these things is the existence of God. ... However, this leads to a problem in Descartes thought. ... There is nothing to say that God is not supremely perfect - Descartes has just assumed this. ... Another problem here is that Descartes believes God to be omnipotent. ...
Descartes doubted everything. ... (Descartes, 30) Descartes then concludes that the piece of wax may take on many different forms alienated from its original. ... (Descartes, 72) Descartes also provides evidence for the existence of things that our perceived through the senses. ... (Descartes, 78) Descartes then comes up with the conclusion that material objects do indeed exist. ... (Descartes, 80) Descartes made specific arguments about the existence of external objects. ...
I have chosen to defend Descartes based on three main reasons. ... "The essence or nature of a mind, Descartes says, is to think. ... Secondly, Descartes believes that he exists; hence I think therefore I exist. ... This basically states that Descartes has proven that he exists and that God has created him and that the world in which Descartes lives is created by God also. ... I believe that Descartes' theory of knowledge is better compared to Hume's because Descartes says that the mind is separate from the body and that it thinks for itself. ...
