1.) A social problem is created by the gap between society's ideals and the actual conditions in that society.
2.) A social problem is a condition that a significant number of people believe to be a problem.
Let us examine the death penalty in context us these definitions. The first definition poses a problem in the argument that I am taking, that the death penalty should in fact be abolished. One can find difficulty in recognizing what society's ideal stance on this topic is. Everybody wants to be safe; there is no questioning that. Nobody wants innocent people to be executed (insane people excluded); there is also no questioning that. So where does this leave us. What is society's ideal condition on this matter? I don't believe it is possible to have one. It seems to be simply a matter of opinion. Do you believe people should be sentenced to death for committing crimes or is life imprisonment punishment enough? While this definition is more difficult to support, I do believe that the death penalty could be considered a social problem due to the high cost to taxpayers, which I will explain later. .
The second definition seems easier to defend. I feel it is safe to say that a significant number of people believe the death penalty to be a problem. Numerous protests and court proceedings will support this, including the article at hand. Andrew Cohen, a CBS legal analyst, argues that the future of the death penalty is unstable, citing a then recent federal trial court judge's decision to void the death penalty under federal law. U.S. District Judge Jed. S. Rakoff found that certain death penalty safeguards to protect innocent citizens were no longer accurate. I share Judge Rakoff's attitude and will now show why.
Argument: I have numerous reasons to believe that the federal death penalty should be abolished. Some of these include innocence, costs, international pressures, and botched executions, all of which I will now explain in further detail.