Thesis: We do not have the freedom of speech unless we have the freedom to refuse to speak. And we do not have the freedom of religion unless we have the freedom to not be religious. So then how do we have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness unless we have the freedom to deny any of these? "Our Life Is Not Our Own If We Cannot Choose When To End It!".
Euthanasia: the final analysis in America today many arguments are centered around the right to choose: the right for women to have and abortion, the right for gays to be allowed to raise children or to be legally married, and the right to physician assisted suicide. These arguments all have something to do with the individual having the right to make this choice, but what if they are unable to make this choice? Say for instance, a man was hit by an oncoming truck, and is being held alive by a machine, what will happen to him? Who will make the decision for him to live or to die? In most case's it will be the physician. Well you may ask yourself why cant we choose, that is to die? If a person is terminally ill and has a quality of life so low that they do not have the will to go on, they are not given a choice. Why then are those people not allowed to seek out a painless alternative in their situation? Though it is illegal many seek out physician assisted suicide or assisted suicide. Most memorable are those involving Dr. Kevorkian. Known as "Dr. Death" as some headlines read, Dr. Kevorkian has become famous for his many assisted suicides and his suicide machine. This all may sound fine and dandy, but not everyone agrees with it. Many religions contend and advise against a person seeking suicide of any kind. In religious views, life is a gift from god and one not to be thrown away or wasted. It is viewed that by committing suicide of any kind we are disrupting God's natural order. A great person once said, "we do not have the freedom of speech unless we have the freedom to refuse to speak.
