An Affirmative Reaction to Affirmative Action .
Affirmative Action is a term used to describe federal initiatives that require people responsible for providing economic and educational opportunities to consider a candidate's race, sex, or disability, especially if the individual's minority affiliation has suffered past discrimination. Initially, Affirmative Action accomplished what it set out to do, but in this day and age its negative effects outweigh its positive ones. By giving preferential treatment to people of a certain race, Affirmative Action contradicts and undermines the rights guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964: equality of opportunity for all individuals regardless of race. Affirmative Action has replaced discrimination against women and minorities with discrimination against white men--reverse discrimination. It forces colleges and businesses to adhere to quotas, discriminating against the best-qualified individuals, whomever they may be. .
Hubert Humphrey, the chief sponsor of the act, had promised that if anyone could find "any language which provides that an employer will have to hire on the basis of percentage or quota related to color, race, religion, or national origin, I will start eating the pages one after another, because it is not in there."(Chavez 34) This explains what the writers of the act wanted it to mean but that is not how it has been interpreted by society. Obviously Hubert Humphrey should have eaten the pages because Affirmative Action does exactly what he said it wouldn't, it creates quotas and percentages for minorities in the workplace. Advocates of Affirmative Action nonetheless contend that terms like "reverse discrimination" and "quotas" are red herrings concocted by white men who fear losing their long-established privileges.(Yates 2) .
Consider the case of University of California v. Bakke. In 1973 a thirty-three year-old Caucasian male named Allan Bakke applied to and was denied admission to the University of California Medical School at Davis.