1. Women's Voting Rights
The Thernstroms discuss the legitimacy of the Voting Rights Act and the .
provisions that followed its implementation. Having suffered through three revisions, the authors argue that the Voting Rights Act became less of an effort of enfranchisement, and more of an effort towards ensuring black leadership in the government. They claim that the Voting Rights Act lost the moral clarity that it once had in the 1960s. The main conflict within the Voting Rights Act is whether or not the right to vote was included with the right to representation. Again, the Thernstroms feel that civil rights pessimism - the belief that racism remained pervasive and undiminished- had blinded voting rights advocates to a changed America".
The rewriting of Section 5 within the Voting Rights Act gave blacks power that was not initially intended. The provision placed the burden on the jurisdiction to prove the racial neutrality of its actions beyond a doubt. Districting and other voting-related changes became subject to federal veto if discrimination was suspected. Now there was a creation of unprecedented majority black districts drawn mainly to ensure racial neutrality. The Thernstroms argued that these provisions entitled blacks to an unfair advantage over their white counterparts by ensuring them Congressional seats. The Justice Departments erroneous interpretation of the law, the Thernstroms follow, took minority candidates out of the "rough and tumble world of politics" by ensuring minority office holding. Blacks now had an advantage over white candidates; whites were not always assured that they would have representation in Congress. .
They continued with their analysis of Section 2, which questioned whether or not there was a standard to the "adequacy of representation" within congressional districts. It asked the courts to measure electoral inequality in voting districts. Congress rejected a head count of blacks holding public office as a means of assessing the measure of discrimination, but saw an increase in the number of majority-black single member districts as a remedy.
1965 Voting Rights Act was the foremost event in the history. ... In addition, it is also about the people who were in the Voting Rights Act and their struggles to get right to vote. ... The Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits discrimination of the black people in voting practices. ... Johnson sent the voting rights bill to congress. ... In conclusion, Voting Rights Act in 1965 was the chief event for the black majority people for their vote to rights. ...
In 1915 the Supreme Court declared the grandfather clause unconstitutional because it violated equal voting rights guaranteed by the Fifteenth Amendment. ... Before the passage of the Act, only 383 African-Americans of voting age, out of approximately 15,000, were registered to vote in Dallas County, Alabama. In the three months following the enactment of the Voting Rights Act, 8000 African-Americans were registered. ... First, it passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which declared certain private acts of discrimination unlawful. In 1965, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act. ...
More importantly, women's voting rights were nonexistent. Many women felt so strongly on the topic of not being able to vote that they began forming groups to get voting rights; they were known as suffragettes. ... Their lack of voting rights was present for many reasons. ... (Own Our Twelve Suffragette Reasons) Marriage was another major relationship that was affected as a result of women not being able to have voting rights. ... The more anti-suffragists put women's voting rights into real life situations, the more it scared them. ...
Many believed that the movement began with the Montgomery bus boycott in 1955 and ended with the Voting Rights act of 1965. ... This stated that if your grandfather was able to vote in 1864 than you could vote. ... These were taxes for the right to vote and had to be paid in the February prior to voting. ... Most of these practices came to an end with the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. ... After the passage of the Voting Rights act of 1965 , the Civil Rights Movements began to move away from it non-violent roots. ...
To understand the importance of voting it might be easier to understand the suffering that went into allowing all Americans to vote equally. ... Many say although the Civil Rights Movement was started with segregation, it ended with The Voting Rights Act of 1965. ... That statement is absurd, just as the thought of not voting. ... The only way to prevent this is by voting. ... From the creation of America we have fought for rights that we deemed a necessity, and the right to have a voice was one of those. ...
The Civil Rights Movement had a profound affect on the United States. ... The Civil Rights Movement was a battle of ideals of what was right and wrong. ... Steps toward equality began with legislation relating to public schools in 1954, and basic civil rights for all Americans were guaranteed in 1964 and 1965 with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. ... The Supreme Court Justices anonymously voted nine to zero ruling that segregation of public schools was a violation of the U.S. ... The March was to demand equal rights legislation in congress. ...
Between 1867 and 1885 Disraeli put a new reform bill that would extend voting rights to more working men. ... Gladstone pushed through a reform bill that extended voting rights still further. While Gladstone & Disraeli were trying to extend voting rights for men, some members in the Parliament were also pushing for women's right to vote but still they couldn't own property and they were not even considered the legal guardians of their children. Disraeli argued in favor of women's voting rights in a speech before the House of Commons in 1866 and he also argued that a woman could ...
Many believe that the civil rights movement began with the Montgomery bus boycott in 1955 and ended with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, though there is debate about when it began and whether it has ended yet. ... At that particular point in history it was unlikely that the immediate aim of the movement was to achieve social and economic equality, it was more likely that they aimed for equal opportunities within the schooling and voting systems. ... Source C is an extract from Martin Luther King's 'Chaos or Community', although it is written by one of the leaders of the civil ri...