The deadly terrorist attack on the World Trade Center created an angry nation that wanted revenge on the perpetrators who committed this act of unjustified actions. The United States must respond not only with one-time retaliatory actions, but with a constant, sustained, and long term crusade against terrorism. Relying only on traditional law enforcement, rapid extradition, and accurate trail of a handful of the perpetrators of carnage will not be sufficient; because, there is no question about it that terrorist incident will continue to plague the nation well into the foreseeable future. The only effective ways on exterminating terrorism is not with old traditional ways, but with new ways that builds strong diplomacy, that tighten financial controls, and that creates adequate military action to finally extinguish terrorism in the face of the planet. Most people will agree with me that this is the only solution to extinguish terrorism. If only if they have read the argument in!.
the editorial of Los Angeles Times "The Right Respond". A persuasive and informative argument possesses firm facts which can influence and alter a reader's belief on a subject. .
Guiding a reader to take part or interpret on what the writer's argument depends on the tone of the paper. A tone of a paper can range to angry vengeful tone to sweet caring tone, and this also all depends on what the writer attitude towards the subject. The attitude of the editorial has a combination of both informative and vengeful attitude. It is informative, because it illustrate on what action should the United States do to enforce terrorism, and it's vengeful, because it tells the reader to take revenge on the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. For instance, "The goal is to dismantle the way and the means that support, train, equip and finance terrorism." this is an informative attitude, because it tells the reader what must be done to extinguish terrorism.
