Term limits have provento be a valid and successful part of our government for nearly three centuries. The Constitution of the United States addresses this issue in firm response. The twenty-second Amendment of the Consitituion states: ".no person shall be elected to the office of President more than twice.". The document also addresses term limits on a local level, allowing each individual state to set their own limits. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Term limits abide by this principle as deemed by a Supreme Court ruling. The imposition of this jurisdiction has resulted in the successive progression of our nation thus far. Term limits allow society to advance smoothly into changing times as conveyed through the ideals of new leadership. This basic principle also in a sense prevents a single leader from usurping 'too much' power in means of an !.
assured position of authority. .
Contrarily, in certain instances, term limits seem all but a hindrance to society. Defined term limits prevent the stability of a competent leader who may be facing the end of his/her term, to remain in power. When society continually sends inexperienced people to represent them, novices will be even more likely to be influenced by those who have more resources and more experience and knowledge. Hence, definite lack of stability in governmental power. With no set term limits, society has the advantage of dismissing one from office only when the majority reaches a consensus. Without term limitation, the economy can benefit as well. Public funding once utilized on elections can be redeposited into the flow economy.
