The war on Iraq is a very complicated topic as there are many views on the actual controversy of whether it was right or wrong to go to war. There have been many articles in newspapers all over the world written by different journalists, giving their view on the justification of going to war. Obviously people are unique and they all have their own views and understandings of such subjects, but it is human nature to have strong feelings about preventing unnecessary violence and torture. I have researched and included two articles from different newspapers that provide contrasting views on the subject of war on Iraq. .
These two articles are written by individuals who have their own views on the war, and I wish to take this opportunity to get my views across, that what I believe was right and wrong. On the 24th of September 2003, it was announced on the BBC News that thousands of inspectors who went to Iraq during and after the war found no proof of chemical and biological weapons and they actually said "Iraq has no mass destruction chemical or biological weapons" which clearly suggests that one of the main reasons for going to war in the first place was a hoax. .
When the Twin Towers were struck within five hours "Defence secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq - even though there was no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the attacks." - CBS NEWS. This is another statement which shows a general grudge against the country and leadership of Iraq, suggesting America would pounce on anything they can use to attack Iraq, most likely because they see Iraq as a potential threat due to the wealth (oil) but there is no evidence to go buy, and I feel that America is run by a illiterate "cowboy" who is trying to finish of what his farther had started.
A few months before the conclusion (about the weapons issue) there was a conspiracy regarding Dr.
