Each part must function in moderation to contribute to the health of the whole. Desire must be inferior to reason, or else it will throw the individual out of balance and lead him into injustice and unhappiness. Emotion can also master desire with the alliance of reason. This alliance according to Socrates is similar to the rulers and guardians of the state. Therefore, the individual is a sort of miniature state, and justice in the soul is like justice in the state. On the contrary, the situation of the unjust, whether state or individual, desires hold a tyranny. Because of a lack of internal control, outside things move the unjust person/state around at will. The unjust ends up living a life of fear and anxiety, the essence of being out of control. Socrates states that only the man of reason has pure pleasures. All others have varying degrees of unhappiness. By equating the philosopher with the man of pure reason, he sets up a situation where proof is not so much necessary for any of his points as it is to say that the philosopher, the only one who sees clearly, says so.? It is these men, the philosophers, who best understood the harmony of all parts of the universe were closest to God and that only they were capable of creating a harmonious and just society. These philosophers, he believed, would agree and get along with each other with equal harmony rather than break into hostile faction.
.
?Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy, and political greatness and wisdom meet in one, and those commoner natures who pursue either to the exclusion of the other are compelled to stand aside, cities will never have rest from their evils- nor the human race as I believe, - and then only will this our State have a possibility of life and behold the light of day.? .
Socrates and Plato also believed that man was not self-sufficient, they believed man would be most happy living in a State.
In addition, in The Politics Aristotle critiques Plato's ideal city and offers his own model for society. ... The main critique of Cephalus" argument is that his proposal is instrumental not intrinsic. ... Plato agrees with the second definition. ... Plato is distrustful of human nature. ... Aristotle proposes the ultimate form of politics is a democracy. ...
David Thoreau would unarguably agree with Plato's quote. ... Since the government does not care about each and every individual, it is not a true democracy. If it is not a true democracy, then injustice still persists. ... Both of these intellectuals give very persuasive arguments, but Socrates is a bit harsher in his critique. ... The American government is a majoritarian democracy. ...
Furthermore, much analysis is available to state against a world like this; reading from the other philosophers there are many points Plato, Kant, and Mill would make against this also. ... On the other hand Mill would critique a world like this because it is strictly focused around physical and bodily pleasures and not the "higher pleasures" of life, like strong emotions, knowledge, and striving for big goals. ... That is something Plato, Kant, and Mill would all critique about a society like this. ... Freedom is one of the most important things I value about the democracy government we ...
The article used as reference for the majority of this paper was written by Patricia Springborg in 1984, titled "Karl Marx on Democracy, Participating, Voting, and Equality". ... She specifically singles out Marx's theory on participatory democracy. Marx, unlike democratic reformist critics such as Plato and Aristotle, believes that democracy should be a community activity and not an individualist one. ... Springborg criticizes this point and states that true democracies place each individualist cause as a matter of concern and priority. She sites that critique mainly to discourage an...
The interwoven connection between this modern concept of freedom and its realisation by technology is nowadays a part of the self-understanding of the Western, human self and a precondition to the historical development of Western, liberal democracies. ... It derives the existential character of the ecological crisis and its life threatening character not only from the so-called 'Reports of the Club of Rome' and from other theoretical and empirical investigations, but in particular from Plato's theorem of the 'plenitude' of a cosmic order. ...
Adverse reaction as a result of action takes place in Plato's Five Dialogues, Henry David Thoreau's Walden and Civil Disobedience, Kurt Vonnegut's Cat's Cradle, and The Marquis De Sade's Justine. ... In Plato's "Euthyphro" (translated by F.J. ... Plato describes his teacher as a man who sought social justice. ... Thoreau believes that the "silent majority" is one that feels that they should be getting more out of their democracy, but do not know how to express their dissent without being unpatriotic. ... Thoreau is harsh in his critique of soldiers and other in...
Hence, utopias are doomed to failure, as my critique will show. ... The twentieth century journalist Malcolm Muggeridge accepted Calvin's view while critiquing enlightened utopian views. ... We know Socrates through his student Plato's writings. Plato sought a republic where people had knowledge of the Idea of the Good. ... Aristotle tried to reconcile Pericles and Plato (i.e., political action and philosophy) in one. ...
It shows concern for both postmodern persons with a postmodern spirituality and postmodern global order in the postmodern societies by listening to the voices of the ecology movement, feminist's critique, pacifist's petition and transcending the "individualism, anthropocentrism, patriarchy, mechanization, economism, consumerism, nationalism, and militarism- (Griffin 1993:ix). ... Fredrich Nietzsche critiques that all claims of truth, reason and science are tools for the preservation of life by the will to power which seeks to control and to dominate (1968: 227). ...
He was the founder of utilitarianism and that is one of the most important in a democracy. ... His first book (Essay Concerning Human Understanding) concerned arguing with Plato, Descartes and other scholars citing that there are no original ideas or principles. ...
