This essay will attempt to present both sides of the debate about abortion. On the one hand, a supporter of a woman's right to have an abortion tend to focus on the rights of the individual woman. Those who fundamentally oppose abortion tend to focus on the rights of the unborn child. While this summary does not in any way clearly delineate the two sides of the argument, nonetheless, it provides a basis from which the issue may be more clearly understood.
In Studies in Family Planning Ruth Roemer states that "the serious health and social consequences of adolescent pregnancy call for the examination of the laws that affect adolescents" access to contraception and abortion. The general law of any country relating to the availability, sale, or distribution and financing of contraceptives affects adolescents. Similarly, a country's general law on abortion applies to adolescents faced with unwanted pregnancy and affects them accordingly."1.
Whatever the laws about abortion say in any given country have even more affect on teenagers. "Particularly legislation or court decisions concerning parental consent for contraception or abortion for a minor, has an important influence on the access that sexually active young people have to services."2.
1 Ruth Roemer, "Legislation on Contraception and Abortion for Adolescents, "Studies in Family Planning, v.16,n.5, Sept./Oct.,1985, p.241.
2 Ruth Roemer, p.241.
Just as the study by Ruth Roemer indicates that there is an academic argument against the strict regulation of abortion, there is an equally compelling popular argument against abortion that is pointed out time and time again in our daily newspapers and magazines. Time Magazine contains the following quotation by one of these countries many teenage mothers:.
Sitting in her parents" Louisville living room, she is the prototypical adolescent, lobbying her mother for permission to attend a rock concert, asking if she can have a pet dog and complaining that she is not allowed to do anything.