As noted in our literature book, Coriolanus was one of Shakespeare's later tragedies, however it doesn't seem to resonate as is finer works. Compared to Shakespeare's other tragedies, Coriolanus seemed to lack depth in characters and plot development. However, structurally it seemed like a solid play that touches on many thematic complexities in which Shakespeare becomes more aware in his later writings.
The protagonist Coriolanus does seem like a real character, in which one could relate himself to. He desires what he does best and resents what is forced upon him. He, as a character is the most interesting part in the play, in my opinion. Coriolanus, is just a practical guy who has many flaws as a person, often thinking of his own desires rather than others. Contrasted with the character Hamlet, who often ponders the consequences and desires what seems moral right, Coriolanus on the other hand, pursues what seems right for him. Although, Coriolanus is stricken with pride, that's what ultimately kills him in the end, his inability to compromise.
However, this play doesn't primarily focus on Coriolanus, but rather seems to be a people play. In this play Shakespeare illustrates the power of the masses, which could be seen through the Plebeians and the Volscians. As the group of the masses, they find themselves swaggering between accepting Coriolanus and condemning him. Thus the Plebeians have the power to get what they want, by using their numbers to their advantage. .
This play illustrates how indecisive people really are, in which some people use to exploit that matter to attain their goals in life. First, Coriolanus, not knowing if he really hates the Plebeians or he likes them and fights for them in the beginning and the Plebeians who at first like Coriolanus, but soon runs him out of town. .
The character Volumnia, Coriolanus, mother is a determined character who uses her authority over Coriolanus to her advantage.
