We are enjoying a very bright future as fast advancing technology centers in a world in which society calling out increasingly loudly for change and creativity. Transmutation is valued more heavily than it has ever been. Affected by the beneficial change of the technology, people are applying change ubiquitously to thoughts, science, education and even leadership. While admitting that the urge for change is conducive to everything, I don't think people's extreme and indiscriminate application in leadership, demanding those in power should step down after five years, is not as wise and advisable as they do in science, though or education. .
The reason contribute to people's appeal to require anyone in power step down after five years is their presupposition that frequent change in leadership can bring the enterprise the precious merit: creativity. Creativity by nature means, the creative mind which can free our though from the trammel of tradition and bring refreshment to our ideas. However, it doesn't follow that frequent change in anything "leadership included "is necessary and an insurance of creativity. Furthermore, creativity alone in itself is not sufficient and predominant in an efficient and outstanding leadership. There are other elements say clairvoyance, wisdom, persistence, honesty, morality which are more important, or at least as important as creativity. If too frequent the change of leadership was and too much emphasize laid upon creativity, the essences that listed above would be largely lost and the leadership centers in creativity would be surly in unsteadiness. And what's more, can anyone argue seriously that the change in leadership will definitely bring the enterprise a creative mind? .
Further put, new things always have many rejections in its germinal application and are not always on the right track. Leadership is not the abnormality. In the transformation of the leadership, efficiency of the enterprises will be inevitably impaired and profit will decrease.
