This story had its ups and downs throughout the story. There are twelve jurors trying to decide if the boy is guilty or non-guilty. There are jurors that won't change there mind and there are those that try to make it a real case. Also, trying to make it a good case, one juror will start the non- guilty side. There are a couple jurors that won't change their mind for certain reasons. There are important props in the story to make the jurors to change their minds.
The climax of the play is when the votes were six to six, six guilty and six guilty. There are six votes not guilty now and there is tension rising throughout this part of the story. "Four: That's six to six. Ten: I"ll tell you something. The crime is being committed right in this room" . Then it starts to rain to cool it down in the room, but then the fan starts to work in the room when they turn on a certain switch in the room where the light turns on. When they start to cool down people start agreeing on things that they never would of.
The resolution in this story in when juror three rips up the picture of his son and when all the votes are non-guilty. When the story ends, juror three realizes that he doesn't have to take his anger out on this kid because of his son. He knows that it's not the boys fault and so then he starts to think about what happened between his son. "Not guilty! [Three walks out of the room, eight glances around quickly and sighs ]" . Juror ten won't change his mind because he's raciest. Then finally at the end he changes his mind because he realized that everything that they were saying about being not guilty was all true. .
The rising action and the falling action in the story are when the votes started to go to non-guilty. The tension was getting really bad until it started to rain and then the fan worked. People were getting angry with each other when they started to change their minds. "Three: All right! Who did it? What idiot changed his vote?" .
Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting play about an unfortunate young man, who was convicted of killing his dad. ... (The el is a train) I believe Twelve Angry Men situation could happen in the real life, and I am almost certain it has already happened, however I do not know if the jury in the real life had someone as smart and intelligent as #8. ...
The movie "Twelve Angry Men" is a clear example of the consensus value found in the Social Change Model of Leadership. In the movie, twelve men of various backgrounds and preconceptions entered a jury room to decide the fate of a young man accused of murdering his father. ... One by one, the men reveal the motivating factors behind their decision to vote guilty. ... At the conclusion of the movie, the men were able to reach a consensus. ... No one could deny the "possibility" of twelve civil, self-conscious, men to work through their controversy kindly, in congruence with their beliefs, and a ...
"Twelve Angry Men" was written as a tele-play in 1954 by Reginald Rose. This play in time was made into a movie of black and white, and the in color some years after that. The better of the two which was in black and white was created in 1957; directed by Sydney Lumet. The colored version was made i...
"After reading Twelve Angry Men we feel confident in the American legal system." ... Reginald Rose questions her confidence in the American legal system in her play Twelve Angry Men, who have the task of determining a sixteen-year-old boy's fate as an innocent or a murderer. ... All twelve jurors have been brought together to make a decision. ...
The film Twelve Angry Men is an excellent tool to use to elaborate the original play because it provides an alternate visualization about the storyline, and it allows a different perspective from the director's viewpoint. ... The film Twelve Angry Men clears up any confusion that might have been caused by the play and gives a different perspective about the characters and the situations they face. ...
Twelve Angry Men The film Twelve Angry Men, staring Henry Fonda, was based on a jury deciding if an 18-year-old boy was guilty of murdering his own father. The twelve men dispute for hours in a hot jury room, sweating from the frustration of all the debating. ... As an excellent critical thinker and leader he convinces eleven men to change their minds. ... As members would change their minds he would be angry towards them. ... At this point all the men stood up from their chairs, walked away and put their backs towards him. ...
All of the jurors do so in "Twelve Angry Men.... This is not the case in "Twelve Angry Men.... Juror Two shows his personality in "Twelve Angry Men.... The jurors in "Twelve Angry Men" especially do so. ... Every one of the jurors in "Twelve Angry Men" does so....
After viewing the film "Twelve Angry Men" I noticed that the characters were however using these exact methods that the textbook emphasized on. ... He tries to force his emotions on the other men in order to change their feelings of the boy. ... They thought this until one of the men voted not guilty. ... Throughout Twelve Angry Men all the characters used different persuasive tactics to finally come to a verdict of guilty or not guilty. ...
Twelve Angry Men In the play "Twelve Anger Men" there is a lot of times where the jurors get angry. ... Until the men do not take being in the jury seriously. Number eight get mad in Act to when number three and twelve play a game of tic-tac-toe. ... We know that the he is angry because the word is the bracket say "angry". Number twelve seems to get mad in act one because he doesn't want to be on the jury he just want the jury to convict the boy of murder so they can all go home. ...
