There are two dominant theories which provide different approaches for explaining the creation of the universe. The first states that there is a great Deity who has created the universe as an elaborate system. The second, and very different approach, states that the elaborate universe was created in a great explosion known as the Big Bang. I will first formulate an argument similar to that of Dr. William Lance Craig's argument for God as the great designer. That argument will be followed by a theory formulated from Dr. Douglas M. Jesseph's contention in support of the Big Bang Theory, which states that one does not need to believe in God to make sense of the universe. I will conclude by showing that it is indeed necessary for one to believe in God as the designer of the intricate system known as the universe.
The universe is a complex system which contains a solar system, gravity and molecular structures. My argument is taken from an idea by Dr. Craig and it states that it is not plausible to think that this universe, seemingly designed for the human species, popped into being, uncaused out of nothing. If there had been one mistake in the creation of the universe, humans would fail to exist. Take, for example, oxygen, water and the sun. All three are needed for humans to survive, without them, it would be impossible to exist. Yet, oddly enough, we find that this certain gas, form of liquid and special star are all properly placed in their needed positions. Circumstances such as these make it only reasonable to assume that there is an intelligent designer of the universe. Therefore, God must exist given that he is the simplest solution to our obscure problem of the creation of the universe.
In this case, one could dispute that my argument for God's existence is lackadaisical, in the sense that scientists have formulated other proofs for the existence of God. However, I will show that my proof is the only reasonable one that explains the creation of the universe, while their theories ultimately coincide with mine.
Evolution vs. Creation The Evolution vs. Creation debate is often referred to as the "Great Debate." ... The first is the historical default - the Creation Model of Origins. This theory maintains that the complex design charging all things suggests a Designer. ...
Biblical creationists believe that the scientific explanations of the creation of the universe contradict the words of the bible. ... Creation science posits that this can be a biblical explanation for the "big bang theory". According to the big bang theory, the universe began as the result of an explosion about 10 billion to 20 billion years ago. ... Creation science contends that the big bang theory bears striking resemblance to the Genesis account. ... Overton, in his opinion in the case McLean vs. ...
Cosmology: Science vs Religion In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Christian belief encountered significant opposition. ... This is called "creationism". ... The "big bang" is not accepted, as this is not answering what caused this to happen. ... Both science and religion have parts to play in the creation of the universe but they just express themselves in different forms. ... Science says how creation happened and religion says why. ...
Religious worldview makes the assumption that the universe and its inhabitants have been designed and created by a supreme "force" or being, which transcend the material world. ... The argument of creationism versus the Big Bang theory is the topic of his essay in this book. ... "It is one this to believe that an organizing Force is required as the "first cause" in the "creation" of the universe, but it is quite another to identify this Force with the god of the Scriptures," Sandage says. ... Whereas the Bible ascribes all to God's creation, science blindly contributes chance and randomne...
Bertrand Russell PSEUDOSCIENCE vs. ... It would start my essay off with a bang; it would make the whole thing seem dramatic and relevant and would smooth out the thesis I would like the present. ... It makes us feel good to think that our dead child can communicate with us, that we are not alone in the universe, that we will stay around our attic for a while when we die. ... Creationism is an example of rejecting a true belief. ... The skepticism that is designed to lead us to the most beneficial beliefs can lead us down strange and ghostly paths occasionally. ...
