He is also conveying that women who get involved with Senate are only manipulating and using Senate to selfishly obtain power and getting readers to think that Hillary Clinton is only using New York as a stepping stool to Presidency. He also criticizes a contender of Clinton, the mayor of New York, Giuliani. Grunwald says that "Clinton might not be seen as the only carpetbagger in the race," and including supporting comments by other people such as, " Democrats gleefully pointed out that a Giuliani press release misspelled "Niagara County."/"I'd rather vote for someone from Arkansas than someone from New York City," said Leroy Brown, 64, a former factory worker who now drives a cab in Binghamton. "That jerk Giuliani has been sending us all his welfare cases and all his criminals. He's the real carpetbagger."/" Grunwald's article provides commentary from other people, who are against Clinton's candidacy, which supports and enhances his argument. People are often more comfortable and agreeable with an article when there is other people giving commentary. This is a strategy writers use to prevent readers from feeling "alone" and getting them into thinking that other people who care and are involved. He also does this to increase the credibility of the story and the reader's trust. In addition, Grunwald spins accurate information to deflect her positive image and makes a neutral statement, negative. Grunwald's article has an overall tone of not just negativity, but formality, which gives off professionalism but at the same time, distance. Some people may trust to agree with the article and other may feel uncomfortable with it's formal style which may lead people to feeling intimidated and ultimately, far-away. Manipulating the language of the story will eventually lead the reader on and manipulate the readers" thoughts. If a news group or a writer manipulates the language of an actual fact -detailed story, they will only lessen their credibility.
