Works of art have been analyzed according to many different schemes. art work of art should be a unique experience and must be treated as such. When analyzing a piece of art many of the categories will overlap, and some are more important for certain pieces than others. Here is one type of guide to help you make a systematic analysis of any work of art.
When writing about a selection of a work of art, think of it as an introducing the reader to works they have not seen for themselves. Then discuss them in such way that increases the reader's understanding and appreciation of them. ( Kieft ).
Identification and brief description of the piece, should be the first paragraph of the paper. Give the tittle of the work, the name of the artist, the medium and the place and date from where it was created, or the last place it had been. Observe the piece, and see if it fits into a known art movement. Describe its physical appearance; it's color, shape, size, condition and what is being represented. The description deals with the relatively obvious, reporting what anyone might see. Explain what is interesting about the piece, and what effect it might have on people.
In order to understand and get at the real meaning of the work or art, you need to analyze it. Line, color, value, texture, shape, rhythm, form, space and mass. Two-dimensional or three-dimensional. Be able to have some understanding of al the art elements, to better describe the piece.
Line is the basic mean for recording symbols, ideas, observations and feelings. Lines are consider paths of action - records of the energy left by moving points (Preble, 41). How does the artist use lines? If it emphasizes contours and edges of objects, or just builds up form with strokes. Are the horizontal and vertical lines emphasize or there are just diagonal ones. And how lines relate to each other in the composition.
Color is the quality of an object or substances with respect to light reflected by the object (crayola.
