Articles on Cloning: Reasons Behind their Credibility for Research paper.
In the research paper, I would like to explore the different types of cloning available and the major issues in the cloning controversy. In order to achieve the above aim, I researched several articles on this issue, and chose four articles to base my paper on. Each of these articles will be of great use to me regarding the points I want to make in my paper. In order to be sure of the sources that I will use, I will be measuring their similarities and differences in this essay.
Similarities and Differences between Daniel Wolfe's report, Ray Bohlin's article, Robert Wachbroit's essay, and Alan Boyles's report:.
In a newspaper published by the Journalism department of Boston University, reporter Daniel Wolfe (2002) reports on a debate on cloning in an article called "Anti-Cloning Team wins by a Nose."" The debate appears to have been focused on the reproductive use of cloning, which could allow an otherwise infertile couple to have a child, who will be exactly like one parent. The article will be of use to me because of the objectivity of the writer. It will also be of use because of the several points of view expressed by the debaters. Each debater makes a particular kind of appeal "emotional or ethical or logical. However, the negative point of this source is that the report does not have the capacity to give an in-depth discussion of the issue. In other words it is limited by its own genre. It is dissimilar to Ray Bohlin's essay and Wachbroit's article because it does not take sides. It simply reports what the experts and public are saying. It is similar to Alan Boyles's report in MSNBC because of its distance and objectivity.
The article called "Can Humans Be Cloned Like Sheep?- published by Probe Ministries, is one of the best articles for my research paper. The author, Ray Bohlin (1997), who has a B.
