On June 13, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman were found murdered in front of her Bundy Condominium .Patrol officers received a disturbance call at Nicole Simpson's residence. They arrived on scene and discovered two bodies. they checked to determine that the two subjects were dead. The officers contacted the detectives on duty.The officers' duties included making sure that no unauthorized people may enter the scene. They also have to protect all possible evidences left by the suspect. In this case, the officers did not do a very good job at securing the scene. They had allowed unauthorized officers the go through the scene allowing contamination to the crime scene.
The first officers on the scene had taken notes regarding the scene. Once the investigators arrived they should have taken over, more detailed notes were taken, sketches of the scene were made, photographs taken and markings were made where Nicole Simpson's and Ron Goldman's body was and the patterns in which the blood had splattered. The pictures needs to show where everything was and the exact location of all evidence, these pictures, sketches and reports would be used in court to defense exclude the suspect in question, or the prosecution in identifying the suspect. .
The reports would show a description of the scene, date, time, location, victims' description, and wounds of the victims this will help investigators reconstruct when and how the crime was committed. While the investigators are doing their job, it is the job of another team to take statements n from witnesses could possibly help the police determine the time of the incident and /or even a suspect description. All the neighbors of Nicole Simpson were interviewed. Their statements helped in the establishment of the time of the incident. .
EVIDENCE.
The importance of crime scene security is crucial. If anything is altered in anyway, touched, moved, a phone call made from the scene, a collector coughing or sneezing could contaminate evidence.
During his trial the prosecution had an abundance of circumstantial evidence stacked against him, but he was subsequently found not guilty. ... The 1995 murder trial of O.J. ... O.J. ... With an overwhelming amount of 6 evidence against him, including blood and DNA evidence that puts him at the scene of the murder, O.J. Simpson was found not guilty of murder. ...
For instance, in the three tests done on O.J. Simpson's DNA samples from his blood, hair, and other tissue, the PCR test was used 70% of the time, which resulted in a match with the samples from a murder scene (Reibstein, Foote, and Miller 55). ... Tommie Lee Andrews was on trial in Orlando for rape. With DNA evidence submitted, the jury convicted him in about fifteen minutes (Froelich and Leyden 1). ... DNA evidence has also freed the innocent after years of suspicion or conviction. ...
DARDAR 1 Forensic Science: The Science of Evidence. ... In 1,000, Quintilian, an attorney in Roman Courts, showed that bloody palm prints were meant to frame a blind man of his mothers murder. ... Here are some examples of court cases where DNA plays an important roll in the outcome of the trial. ... At a banquet held for Kotler he received a standing ovation from the guests of his lawyer, Barry Schech and Peter Neufeld, who would later use their DNA expertise to help free O.J. Simpson. ...
Plea bargaining has advantages a defendant who is on trial is uncertain what the outcome of the trial will be. ... For example, in the infamous O.J. Simpson murder trial, prosecutors waged a long and expensive trail against the pro football player and the evidence showed that O.J. Simpson had murdered his wife and friend but he was found innocent by the jury. ... DNA evidence was found but it was not enough to charge someone else with the crime, but it put reasonable doubt that the teenage boys were guilty. ...
