124). .
High policing agencies collate data, process them into intelligence (analyzed information) and threat assessments, disseminate their intelligence products on a need-to-know basis, store them in various formats for a time and finally dispose of them when they have lost their relevance. There are two fundamental differences between high policing security intelligence and low policing or criminal intelligence (Brodeur, 2007). American policing has experienced a time of critical change and development. In a moderately short historical time frame, the police started to rethink their key mission, the nature of the center techniques of policing, and the character of their associations with the community that they serve (Weisburd and Braga, 2006). Community policing have made police in the 21st century a great deal more receptive to community and their issues than policing in the decades prior to this wave of advancement started (Maguire and Ruler, 2004). American police were gotten unconscious when the nation's security needs were profoundly adjusted by the terrorist assaults on American soil on September 11, 2001 (Universal Relationship of Head of Police, 2005). Furthermore, they were not the only one. Nations that had sorted out to battle terrorism much sooner than September 11, for example, England and Germany, started to reappraise their preparation and reconsider the part of police in counteracting terrorism and restricting its results (Bayley and Weisburd, 2009).
Public opinion towards the police, and especially impression of police authenticity, are viewed as one of the critical results of policing. Police authenticity is essential for instrumental reasons connected with open participation and police viability (Tyler 2004). Public attitudes towards the police and assessments of its authenticity could be influenced by police inclusion in counter-terrorism, which has essentially expanded as of late.
