This security is where I consider as convenient and interesting. Your safety before death dictates touted by double unjust accusation and even some illogical point leaves a taste in which he reader encounters the dilemma of why accepting a death sentence.
With regard to this argument, deduced by first instance Socrates to be wise and moral man, rather die following the law to live against her and her same ideology, but it is not known for sure his vision for politics (based on both Plato and Xenophon). The second explanation that I thought was about his belief in the gods and in life after death. By having this belief and again based on their ideology considered feasible that the gods had thus determined their fate; at the end of Plato's Apology refers to this by mentioning that no one knows how lucky they will, only the gods know. Loved situations seem to support the serenity of Socrates to this punishment. But I digress a little deeper into the subject crossed my mind that perhaps Socrates option consider this as a form of sacrifice for his fame. Perhaps reading this fragment previous explanations lie down. Within the trial did not intend to label as Socrates or intellectually superior moral mind, this paper aims to give further explanation where Socrates is seen as a human, and human referring to the situation say that perhaps his vision at that time was not completely objective . To support this argument first I support myself with the age of Socrates, 60, at this age it is normal that the body begins to wear out and it stands to reason that many of the things with which Socrates was wrapped could turn out to be unthinkable. Over the years, I found this argument in the text written by Xenophon where Socrates himself explains feel older and more likely to face old age where intellect was subject to the demon of age, where the physical consequences could affect everything learned.
