As a result, the crime control perspective can carry out its duties with confidence since whatever they are doing is recognized by law. The duties and responsibilities of various personnel on the crime control are clearly set out in the constitution. Failure to control crime, as required by low will lead to the law-abiding citizens becoming victims of all sorts of unjustifiable invasions of their interests.
Rights protection can be seen as a form of policing activity that is in line with Rawls' "equal liberties" principle. For example, at a point where arrest is imminent, police officer read suspects their rights to remain silent in order to protect their 'Fifth Amendment against the self-incrimination (Stuart, 2008). In conclusion, the crime control perspective, if properly implemented will safeguard many people against various forms of injustices.
Question 2.
Is Justice applied fairly when crime control is taken into perspective? Why or why not? .
Rawls views social justice to be about assuring the protection of equal access to liberties, rights, and opportunities, as well as taking care of the least advantaged members of the society (Kamalu et. al, 2010). This implies that the consistence with social justice depends on whether for social whether it promotes or hinders equality of access to civil liberties, human rights, opportunities for healthy and fulfilling lives, as well as whether it allocates a fair share of benefits to the least advantaged members of society (Kamalu et. al, 2010).
According to Miller, social justice deals with the distribution of good (advantages) and bad (disadvantages) in society, and more specifically with how these things should be distributed within society (Kamalu et. al, 2010). It is concerned with the ways resources are allocated to people by social institutions. This therefore means that something is just or unjust depends on whether advantages and disadvantages are distributed appropriately in society well-being of members of the society.
