2 percent of the number of marriages. In the 36 other states for which 2009 data are available, it was 50.3 percent"(n.p.). This is not just a happy coincidence as some might think. It shows that like the heterosexuals, homosexuals are willing to protect their own family, which positively contributes to the stability of the society. Therefore, it is reasonable that they are allowed to marry and earn the benefits of a marriage. .
Opponents, on the other hand, disapprove of Obama's support for fear of the society's erosion. One argument against Obama is that his declaration evoked objection among many Americans and promoted homosexuality within the young generation. As a president, he should never encourage same-sex marriage since it would harm the institution of marriage, which is meant to be the union of a man and a woman. Breaking the tradition, it potentially causes opposition of many religion groups such as the Catholic Church, Islam, and Southern Baptist Convention. Worse, this can contribute to ruining the young generation. Apart from people who are homosexual from birth, there are a lot of young people who want to become homosexual because it is a trend. Young generation plays such an important role in the society's future. What would our society become if that generation is spoiled? Besides, if homosexuality is spread widely, sooner or later, procreation would become a huge problem. As the matter of fact, protests are likely to be raised against Obama's declaration and cause him lose favor in many citizens. .
It is reasonable to assume that marriage between a man and a woman is the cornerstone of the society. Nevertheless, same-sex marriage does not damage family. What is wrong with the coexistence of same-sex marriage and heterosexual one? Evidently, legalizing gay marriage does not put an end to traditional marriage. Moreover, if reproduction is a problem, then infertile couples should not be allowed to marry either.
