A close look at this line of philosophical thought reveals a hedonist perspective, although hedonism approaches the issue differently. The lowest rank represents the level in which the least complicated individual purely exists to satisfy his physical senses. This can reside as well rest in various forms, including but not limited to self-indulgence highlighted by an eat, drink, and be merry philosophy. In a nutshell, such individuals are driven by the desire to have fun as well as enjoy the trappings of the moment (McDonald, 2012). .
Higher up in the ladder exist the busy man deeply engrossed in worldly affairs as it were. Though existing on the same premise, selfish and worldly pleasures, he does seek pleasure in the physical wisdom; his attention is trained on achieving success through such means like an intelligent business deal. From this, Kierkegaard does not appear to be anti-philosophical as the underlying theme presented here is supported by the inbuilt characteristics that motivate individuals to describe who he is and his purpose on earth. In this regard, man is only motivated by self-gain in regards to achieving self-satisfaction. From this, his reasoning is relevant to that point. .
The Ethical Stage .
This stage results from the distraction of the aesthete after he becomes exhausted from committing to any particular role, interpersonal relationships, as well as life. Kierkegaard argues that any commitment at this moment will suffice, but does not propose any particular religion, person, or dogma at this moment as long as the identified commitment is centered on self-commitment as well as commitment to others (McDonald, 2012). This argument finds relevance in the world from a philosophical perspective as all human beings are innately good and driven by the desire for self-improvement and consideration for others before taking the appropriate decisions based on ethical reflections.
