Mark Zuckerberg, Steve Jobs, and Elon Musk were eminent engineers who became humongously prominent by utilizing their knowledge and got given adequate financial rewards and reputation. As a consequence of working alone, Is group collaboration more effective for creating value and ideas compare to solo working? In my opinion, working individually can provide further satisfaction, increase efficacy, and become more productive. However, this viewpoint can possess some limitation such as the fact that cooperation can lead to the generation of more amounts of ideas.
Accomplishing achievements on an individual basis can engender higher amounts of satisfaction and credits. According to Dan Ariely, a professor in University of Duke, people get more motivation when they endeavor and create an entity by themselves. This is called the Ikea Effect, this effect states, that there is a great tendency of people would buying more Ikea furnitures because they actually have to assemble the parts by themselves. Also, using the same logic, convenient cake mixes which was existing within 1950s, did not receive adulation from the general population, due to the lack of effort that was required from people in order to make the cake. in the late 1950s, the cake mix was not exposed to everyday lives because of this hindrance which that people did not have to do anything with it. This ideas can be considered hypothetical, because different research might claim the fact that people actually show the proclivity of preferring more facile(easy) formula products. the higher amount of input is highly correlated with the satisfaction that people receive. The previous phenomenon can occur in the workplace. It is same while working individually. Cooperation would not make one satisfied enough because there is much less work that one have done, but then working individually, one would be capable of obtain the maximum pride.
