Organizations have a right, and sometimes even an obligation, to monitor activity on their computers or network, but the ethics involved are often blurred. The growing presence of surveillance technology is directly related to the nature and the wide spread use of computer technology; particularly the expanding use of computer networks. As employers expand their reliance on interconnected information system to collect, process, store, and distribute information to support their organization, they face an increasing challenge to protect the integrity, confidentiality, insure productivity and maintain the availability of data. Along with this challenge, management needs to choose an appropriate level of monitoring or protection of the employer's network while also ensuring that the security measures that are adopted do not breach the fundamental privacy interests of employees.
The right of an employer to monitor an employee's computer is an ethical issue that is subject to individual interpretation. Some would call it a responsibility. Others would call it an invasion of privacy. Monitoring employees' use of company computers, e-mail, and the internet involve the same basic issues that come into play with general searches at work, telephone monitoring, and video surveillance. Those basic issues revolve around letting employees know that as far as work is concerned, they have no expectation of privacy in their use of company premises, facilities, or resources and that they are subject to monitoring at all times. Naturally, reason and common sense supply some understandable limitations, such as no video cameras in employee restrooms, and no forced searches of someone's clothing or body, but beyond that, almost anything is possible in the areas of searches and monitoring. Undoubtedly, the need to secure information from those who might damage expensive computer systems or conduct economic espionage or perform some other such havoc has never been greater.