The husband-and-wife duo, George and Sheila Grant, undertook the highly controversial topic of abortion and the many elements that pertain to foetal rights in their "Abortion and Rights" essay. It is apparent from the authors' captivating arguments that they are against the legalization of abortion. Although persuasive, their essay contains numerous fallacies that will be addressed in this essay. In result, the arguments are weakened by said fallacies and lack the persuasive method that the author intended to evoke. The following paragraphs will provide a critique of the essay, whether or not the evidence examined is indeed supportive and valid of their claim. .
Let us first begin with their initial statement they made in the first paragraph. "The right of a woman to have an abortion can only be made law by denying to another member of our species the right to exist." They argue that foetal rights are lower than that of the mother by default if we are to allow abortions, hence the following linked premise "The right of women to freedom, privacy and other good things is put higher than the right of the foetus to continued existence." By stating this fact, they claim that the foetus and woman are both of the same species and hence should be subjected to the same set of rules. If humans have rights and if foetuses are human (based on their claim) then the foetus must have the same level of rights as the mother. Although the secondary premise made, is linked to the 1st, there is a noticeable lack of evidence to validate the claim. In terms of committed fallacies we may find some in this argument. .
Firstly, the claim that foetuses and the mothers of said foetuses should be held to the same level is a disputable claim "And because the foetus is of the same species as the mother, we are we are inevitable turned back onto the fundamental question of principle: what is it about the mother (or any human being) that makes it proper that she should have rights?".
To ignore the rights of others is selfish and injustice. ... In the response the argument that the fetus is not a human life pro-lifers ask "What is a fetus if it is not alive? ... Abortion is culturally endorsed murder. ... Both of these arguments are convincing and both have a logical basis. ... The Argument: Ou...
There are thousands of arguments for and against this topic and both sides of the argument are firm on their beliefs and argue extensively. ... Also, the issue of women's rights to their own bodies and health, women's rights being in conflict with their own children's rights is another social situation. ... There is over 18 million results and which means that there are thousands of arguments for and against the topic. ... They value human rights, irrespective of the size of the human; because they value the rights and life of unborn babies too, they aim at saving their lives. ....
By contrast, the Pro Life advocates motivation is to protect the rights of pre-born children everywhere. The first step in protecting these rights is the necessity to educate all human kind that life begins at the moment of conception; therefore millions of lives are lost and/or irrevocably damaged each day due to the carnage called Pro Choice. ... Factual arguments go unheard by the majority (or at least the lawmakers) as lobbyists nationwide successfully peddle their lies and misinformation. ... It is a matter of simple truth determined by scientific observation and analysis. ... Na...
Alysen Rogers: Argumentative Essay Perhaps an issue less debated than abortion or the death penalty, but equally potent, in today's society concerns the legalization of cannabis sativa: marijuana. ... Through careful analysis of facts and various opinions, one, when analyzing the data with an open mind, will inevitably arrive at the conclusion that the legalization of marijuana should transpire. ... However, this argument contains no scientific evidence and is just not true. ... Considering this argument, one can then formulate another, more relevant argument. ... NORML fights for th...
The argument has been made that the legalization of prostitution can be beneficial in many ways. ... Many use the constitution as an argument that it is free choice to do what one pleases with their time and what they do for money. The counter argument is that the legalization of prostitution would only cause an increase in human sex trafficking and kidnapping within the U.S. and other states. While both cases have valid points and provide a strong argument it does not seem that prostitution will be legalized countrywide any time soon. 3. ... The ninth amendment states: "The enumeration in th...
"The traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis. ... "Abuses of laws are always possible, but this is no justification for not enacting and enforcing a good law designed to protect and extend the rights and welfare of all persons. ... An argument could be made that rather than abusing the rights of individuals, the practice of euthanasia protects the quality of life of human beings and could be governed by legal safeguards similar to other practices such as abortion (Russell 227). One of the most basic arguments against euthanasia is the moral is...
Research Paper Analysis - Legalization of Human Cloning I. ... "Also, doctors hope that by being able to study the multiple embryos developed through cloning, they can determine what causes spontaneous abortions. ... Summary Evaluation of the Arguments Each of these works offer a well thought out arguments whether Cloning should or should not be legalized. ... There is also a debate as to the moral rights of clones. ... Cloning will be a big issue in the future kind of like the way abortion is now. ...
The court, ruled that, bans on assisted suicide constitute a violation of the second patient's equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.9 In his majority opinion, appellate Judge Stephen Reinhardt of Los Angeles wrote: "If broad general state policies can be used to deprive a terminally ill individual of the right to make that choice, it is hard to envision where the exercise of arbitrary and intrusive power by the state can be halted." Reinhardt's analysis relies heavily on language drawn from U.S. Supreme Court abortion case, Roe v. ... Like the decision of whet...
Defining gender violence as a violation of human rights is a relatively new approach to the problem. ... However, attention gradually shifted from peace to human rights, with a growing interest in defining violence against women as a human rights offense expressed in the 1980 Copenhagen and 1985 Nairobi meetings. ... At the 1993 UN Conference on Human Rights in Vienna, sponsored by the High Commission on Human Rights, this issue became even more important (see Schuler 1992). ... The concluding document, the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, formally recognized the human rights of...
