Conye goes on and on about how so many features are wrong, impractical, and imperfect that there is no way an all-knowing designer would create such species. If there was a creator then why would they create subjects with flaws and weakness? A similar question can go for evolution. If evolution is survival of the fittest and if they adapt so well to their environments then why have they not gotten rid of the unnecessary features yet? Why haven't they evolved to be perfect? I believe this is because they are perfect how they are. Yes there may be a weakness here or there but this is the feature this species needs at the moment to live their life. The flounder is flat and rotates its eye because it feeds and protects itself better this way. They are bottom dwelling fish that camouflages in the ground to hide from predators and prey. The eye moves so that the fish can get use of both eyes. This isn't an imperfect feature, it is a design that lets this fish survive. Call it evolution or intelligent design, this fish does not have an imperfection either way. .
Coyne uses a lot of science to back up his arguments. This makes sense considering he is a Biology professor and that evolution is a scientific theory. However, in one instance his objective scientific mind turned off and his subjective and assuming mind turned on. He says, "if you wanted to design a flatfish, you wouldn't do it this way.""(82) He is referring to the odd procedure a flounder goes through to become a flatfish and that it is flat on its side not its stomach. This statement assumes that everyone would agree to this "bad design, the concept of intelligent design is wrong." He only thinks this cannot be intelligent design because in his mind it is unintelligent to have a fish designed one way just for it to change into an asymmetrical odd looking fish. He believes if intelligent design were true that the fish wouldn't be flat on its side but on its stomach like other flatfish.
Evolution vs. Creation The Evolution vs. ... This theory maintains that the complex design charging all things suggests a Designer. The second theory is the more recent, atheistic explanation - the Evolution Model of Origins. This theory assumes that the complex design charging all things is a product of random chance and a lot of time. ...
The selection is purely automatic or spontaneous, without plan or design. ... The creation of non-living and living things is detailed in Genesis. ... Genesis is an important explanation of the origin of living things. Genesis clearly states that God made all living and non-living things on earth. ... Genesis offers believable truths of how living things came about. ...
Natural selection also contradicts the second law of thermodynamics which states that, left to themselves, all things tend to deteriorate rather than develop, while evolution wants to go in the opposite direction. ... The fact that living things have similar patterns and design points to a common designer better than to a common ancestor. ... No scientific law can account for "non-living things- coming to life. ... Evolutionary textbooks teach that at some time in the distant past, life arose from non-living substances. ... The invariable observation is that only living things give rise to oth...
The evolution debate. The theory of evolution suggests a process by which all living things have developed from primitive organisms through changes occurring over billions of years, a progression including the most advanced animals and plants. Evolution suggests that perhaps once upon a time the world was nothing but atoms and they just happen to fall in place over the years to create the world as we know it today. Intelligent design suggests that a divine force has guided the creation of everything we have today. ... Is "intelligent design" not also a cornerstone theory for biological r...
What is Behe's case for Intelligent Design? ... In the paper titled, The Modern Intelligent Design Hypothesis Michael Behe puts forward the argument that some biological systems at a molecular level are the result of deliberate intelligent design (a maker). Behe rejects the idea that evolution (natural selection) can account for the existence of biochemical complexity in the living cell . ... Below is an example of Behe's argument for Intelligent Design that attempts to disprove Darwinism's claims of evolution being responsible for complex biological machines: 1. ... Behe'...
Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution: Evolution vs. ... Beyond that, however, he realized that some of his own observations of fossils and living plants and animals cast doubt on the Lyell-supported view that species were specially created. He noted, for example, that certain fossils of supposedly extinct species closely resembled living species in the same geographical area. ... These individuals often believe that the present physical form of Earth can be explained by catastrophism, including a worldwide flood, and that all living things were created miraculously, essentially in the fo...
On the sixth day God created humankind and gave us dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds in the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth. ... The last subcategory for opposition is intelligent design. ... People who believe in intelligent design believe that life was created from scratch by God. ... Separatism separates science into how things came to be the way they are and then religion answers why. It can make things more clear for an individual because through science we can see how things came to be and then through religion we know why they came to be that...
These hind-sight explanations were always possible by invoking additional assumptions, exploiting conceptual vagueness, or making conceptual modifications solely designed to make the evidence appear to follow from their fundamental principles and to prevent refutation of their position by new empirical data (Bala, Arun. ... This claim invoked the famous debate over the scientific nature of Darwin's theory of evolution. ... Living organisms have descended with modifications from species that lived before them. ... The process of evolution has not been observed by any human experimenter in ...
The shoulders of giants have been all of living species' starting point since creation, where knowledge is passed on from those that have come before. ... Allowing for those that have come before to educate is one of the greatest offerings of mankind as knowledge is primarily all that is important in human evolution. ... In the general science of all that is living, progress is sought-after, and thus we must stand on the shoulders of our predecessors. ... We see more, and things that are more distant, than they did, not because our sight is superior or because we taller than they, but bec...
