Because of the nature and concept charter schools embrace a different approach and dynamic perspective that involves community efforts. .
Charter school financial support on their majority comes from grants and donations made by different sectors; also they receive a modest contribution from school districts. Because of their nature, Charter schools, infrastructures may vary on sizes forcing them in some cases to have smaller populations in comparison to public schools that are pre-designed with larger buildings; as a result charter schools tend to be more selective with their pupils. In Comparison to charter school, public schools systems also depend on their majority by Government funds that are base on student average daily attendance throughout the scholar year. Student attendance is a priority in public schools in order to get financial support to meet their needs to forthcoming scholar year; According to "Oakland Achieves: a Public Education Progress Report," presented by Oaklandachieves.org in 2010-11 Oakland Unified School District roughly lost $9,258.000 due to student absent (Oaklandachieves.org p5). .
In addition to the revenue and fund both systems face the challenges of meeting the requirements and criteria standards set by state educational law. Over the last decade Oaklandachives.org note on A public Education Report Progress that a remarkable increase on Academic Performance Index had been reach, five Oakland schools met the minimum goal of or greater and by 2012, forty two schools charters and public reached that bench mark (Oaklandachieves.org p3). Making the of City of Oakland one of the most successful on California and proving that charter and public schools can be successful systems. .
In addition to charter schools vs. public schools discussions, an article published on the hub pages Sara Johnson points out the benefits and contradictions of charter schools, she illustrates the contrasts of public vs.
