A Boundary Between Collectivism and Consciousness:.
The question of an inevitable Proletariat revolution and its possibilities are theoretically interesting, but in will not prove to be inevitable. There is little dispute in The German Ideology that revolution is needed to restore man to his place as a functioning, fulfilled, and fruitful member of society. The chains bound to him by meaningless work and the exploitation of all workers for their simple value of simply creating "things" while feeling the reduction of the self to a "thing", something inhuman, is predatory for the Proletariat. The question that needs to be answered is -is there a need for man to be fulfilled and free of the boundaries laid by years of Capitalist expansion or is it a necessity to? Is he so caught up in the very "things" in which he creates that the machinery of his making, becomes the machinery of the man himself? Is man so motorized, so to speak, that he cannot speak for himself? It is not my belief that man can see past these distractions while he is so heavily invested in this machine of money, commodities, Capitalism, and power. Man is powerless as a worker and only powerful if he steps away from the machine and refuses to work in this way. But, this is an action done alone and separates the man from the group, alienating himself from the group in which could conspire to revolt, but finally helps to acquaint himself with his own human nature and true aloneness in the world. .
The fact is that men cannot be collectively conscious of the natural world, in so forth that the realization of the forces of nature and a natural state of being scares one when they realize they are alone. Men are, therefore, stuck in a position of staying a part of a machine of their own making, an unnatural force, but one that keeps them all together or the opposite. One may realize that their relationships have been, up unto the point of their new-found consciousness, superficial and self-serving.
