The ethics of human cloning is a big controversy in the world, and for many good reasons. Many people find it against beliefs, others find that it is an emotional issue and some find it to be very dangerous. However, is it really right? Should human cloning be allowed?.
Human cloning is believed to be wrong because it is highly against beliefs, religious as well as personal. Cloning a human being is creating a new life. It is like playing the role of God, where you decide the clones" life and looks which makes it highly against beliefs. If every person were to be a clone or be able to have cloned body parts such as kidneys and livers that could be transplanted into their body, the value of life as we know it would be diminished. For example a person who may have thought twice about smoking before cloning was introduced, may now not even care about the effects, because a new lung can be cloned for them and replace the old one that they damaged. Cloning human body parts and humans can cause life to be less valuable, and less of an opportunity. Another thing that is highly against beliefs, the fact that is that the fetuses that are used to experiment on that helped to get cloning where it is today, were all aborted children. This means that a child was conceived and then murdered before birth for medical purposes, which is thought as wrong in many ways. .
Along with personal beliefs comes emotion, and there are a lot of emotional beliefs, to do with cloning ethics. Children who are cloned will end up spending their lives" watched over by the media, and by scientists. A cloned child will not grow up in a normal environment, which could make the child stand out and cause teasing, as well as low self-esteem. Other children may make fun of the "clone" because they are different, and not normal. Another concern, one brought up by Dr Patrick Dixon, who is a leading authority on the ethics of human cloning, is that if the child is cloned from her mothers" genes:.