The question of whether your heredity or your environment has more of an affect on your .
Many studies conducted between twins however, have shown .
that things such as behavioural traits and personality are inherited qualities. Also, it has also .
been shown that traits such as leadership, and traditionalism were also determined by heredity.
It is evident that heredity has more of an influence on ones behaviour than does their .
environment.
The idea that heredity is more influential on ones behavioural traits can be supported by .
studies done on twins. Since identical twins have the same genetic make up, they are ideal .
candidates for this type of study. Observations from such studies state that in many cases twins.
tend to have simular behavioural traits. Things such as mannerisms, gestures, speech patterns, .
habits and jokes have been observed as common between many sets of twins. Another example.
that supports the greater influence of heredity are examples of siblings raised in different homes.
In a 1979 statement by "Willerman" it is explained how researchers studied children who had.
been adopted and raised apart(away from their natural mothers). The IQ scores of the natural.
mothers and children were compared. While the scores of the children and their adoptive parents.
were not simular, those of the children's natural mother's were. In addition, another study .
conducted among twins revealed that personality traits of twins that had been raised apart are.
very simular as well. Such traits as "social-closeness", "harm avoidance", and "well being", .
were seen as being simular among people with simular genes (twins).
Having being raised by my father for th past 16 years of my life, it was quite a change.
for me to come and live with my mother. I soon found however that we shared many traits that.
I had before thought were unique to myself. Strikingly simular tastes in food, art, and even our.
hair styles were discovered.
Nature vs. Nurture: Do They Mold Who We Become? When it comes to Nature vs. Nurture there are two words that come to mind: Heredity and Environment. Scientist and experts believe that these two subjects are the main ingredients to making us who we are and who we become. When scientist and exp...
The debate concerning 'nature vs. nurture' is one of three controversial issues argued when psychologists talk of human development. ... On the other hand, some will say the environment in which one is raised, or nurtured in, significantly influence development. ... 'Nature vs. nurture' opens the door for two other issues that are argued about also. ... A nurture theorist supports the thought of the environment a person is surrounded in directly affects development. ... The first, 'continuity vs. discontinuity', is based upon the following questions. ...
The Great Nature vs. ... Although the cause of alcoholism is not known, biochemical imbalances in the brain and heredity have been acknowledged in playing a role. ... Again, no definitive evidence to support either heredity or environment exclusively. ... With alcoholism, I would have to lean towards the environment as the primary influencing factor. ... I think both sides of the nature vs. nurture issue are correct to varying degrees depending on the issue. ...
Many believe that the primary component determining our perception is instinctive in nature, and passed down by our heredity. Others subscribe to the theory that these traits can be nurtured, and therefore molded by their respective environment. ... We are well aware of the net results; and we may adequately document the source of the nurturing involved, but we have no access to the nature or heredity influences. ... LeDoux proves this point in an opinion article titled "Nature vs. ... The "nature vs. nurture" debate is one that has perplexed psychologists since the beginning of modern psychol...
Nature vs. Nurture The debate about Nature vs. ... They feel that a person's surroundings and environment play little to no role. ... A person's environment does play an important role from early on. ... In conclusion, both heredity and environment affect people considerably, I favor environment as having more influence. ...
Nature vs. Nurture The relative contributions of nature and nurture are an apparent part of human development which makes us ask the question, are heredity and environment opposing forces?(Sternberg 100) The question of nature vs. nurture can be examined and can be attempted to be comprehended in many ways. ... Personality development continues throughout the life span as a result of every new experience within that environment. ... Both views of nature vs. nurture hold a substantial amount of evidence supporting each idea about how we become who we are. ...
Nature vs. Nurture The relative contributions of nature and nurture are an apparent part of human development which makes us ask the question, are heredity and environment opposing forces?(Sternberg 100) The question of nature vs. nurture can be examined and can be attempted to be comprehended in many ways. ... Personality development continues throughout the life span as a result of every new experience within that environment. ... Both views of nature vs. nurture hold a substantial amount of evidence supporting each idea about how we become who we are. ...
This issue is whether heredity or environment plays a greater role in the determining or shaping of an individual's behavior. ... During the late 1700s, the nature vs. nurture debate began to heat up between philosophers. ... Leibniz once wrote that fundamentally their views were the same about the nature vs. nurture question (Cowie, 1999). ... Behaviorists believed that the environment was the greatest factor in shaping behavior. ... The nature vs. nurture debate over the last forty years has reached an agreement that they both influence the development of human behavior. ...
