History, written in a lively and descriptive manner as the best is, so to grip and hold the reader, has veiled a lesson or moral such that the reader might modify his or her view of the present and his forecast of the future. This, incidentally, is the principal reason that history should be at the core of any form of education. The actual twists and turns great historical happenings are not so important in themselves as not all our histories are accurate records that, reflect the true course of events. That is to say the "facts" in history are not always completely accurate because some historians are not careful in their research, some have some ulterior reasoning based off individual theories, or simply because the writing of an accurate history is an impossibility. But on the contrary, it is a historian's job to interpret the facts from the past as well as make conclusions based on theory or ideas to dictate the past as accurately as possible.
No one is capable of dictating all the facts and truths of an event in a history book, let alone knowing all the facts of an event of the past, therefore historians were not as careful in their research. And so, historians had to select the main points that seemed significant while rejecting others and re-create parts together from which were not recorded. Resourceful? No, not really. .
Because there are many historians who think they know all the "facts," there will always be a dispute about what is considered accurate and incorrect. One historian may think certain facts should be overlooked, while other facts are crucial information for the reader to grasp. Because of this, the "facts" expressed by historians in are not always completely accurate. Human motivation and behavior is part of a theory or idea used to create evidence by historians in order to make all the pieces of the puzzle unite. Historians can have ulterior reasoning based off individual theories.
