Stephen Crane and Jack London are both writers of Naturalism, but the two authors have different styles of naturalism. Crane's "The Open Boat" and London's "To Build a Fire" are two stories that approach the idea of naturalism in different methods. In "The Open Boat," there is a conflict among the men in the boat and the weather surrounding them, along with the conflict among themselves trying to work together to survive. In the story "To Build a Fire," the conflict is between the man, with his lack of instinct, and nature itself.
The idea of naturalism states the events simply happen and just because, and characters" actions are based upon these events. However, the man in "To Build a Fire" seems to be at fault for everything that happens to him because of his so called bad luck. This would make it seem like Nature is against him, but Nature is still indifferent to the man's presence because the weather would be the same regardless if the man was there. The man does not seem to be experienced enough to be able to survive what nature throws at him. He ignores everything that makes it obvious that it is extremely dangerous to travel. He was warned once by the old man to keep out of the cold and then warned again by nature after he fell into the snow. Yet he still goes out into the cold. The man falls through the snow and builds a fire under a spruce tree which causes the snow in the tree to melt and snuff out the fire. When the man made a second mistake, everything that happened became his fault because he was warned yet his still insisted on traveling. Yet Nature does not do all these things to the man. He did not have the instinct to know that he could possibly fall into the snow or the fact that building a fire under a tree was not a good idea. These unfortunate events just happen. Even though the man has methods to survive, he is at fault for being out in the cold because he decided to travel instead of having the instinct to stay out of the weather.
