The political media is a huge driving force the United States uses when determining decisions in regard to foreign policy. Even though media figures have there own ideological agenda, each agenda is in someway another viewpoint in reflection to the writer and to their demographic of readers.
The Conservative or "right wing- viewpoint usually states America to be the world's police force, for regions or countries in which there is a primary or hidden financial agenda. Many times conservatives state there is an unruly or "undemocratic- leader, which oppresses the indigenous people of the region. The middle view represents an objective and or informative view of foreign policy. This particular view has an agenda to stay out of the left or right wing perspective unless either side proves factually accurate. However, sides will not be taken by propaganda, instead usually the reader makes a decision. .
The Liberal view gives the United States the oppressor or the imperialist label. It shows our foreign policy as creating problems and in to some extent chaos in the area's we tie ourselves with. It's no surprise there are plenty of conflicts between the right and the left as what to do about the world, however both of them are very crucial to keeping our nation a land of diverse ideas and philosophy's. The Regional articles could be either liberal or conservative, depending on the civil liberty stance of the particular region's government. However seeing that some news in the country's/region's or ran by conglomerates, their philosophy, political views, or financial interests could shape their nation's news( uh hum Fox News). .
Venezuela is one of the most important countries of our interests in South America. There population is more than 26 million strong, there native people are called mestizos (people of mixed European and Native American ancestry) this makes up 67% of there population, the other 21 percent is made up of people of white European ancestry.