In the two reading assignments that were assigned each of the characters argue whether breaking the law is just or unjust. The characters namely being, Socrates and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., both have different outlooks on the authorities, and the laws in which they must abide by. Both stories are taken from an earlier date in which Socrates and Dr. King were placed in prison after breaking the law. I think that Dr. King and Socrates have completely different outlooks on weather it's right to intentionally break the law.
I think that the argument between Dr. King and Socrates is very apparent that they disagree on weather a person should intentionally break the law. Socrates being a firm believer in what is just and unjust supports his position that escaping from prison and fleeing in exile to an adjacent city would be unjust because by him doing this would result in breaking the commitments that he has agreed upon by the courts after he was found guilty. Socrates knowingly argues with his friend Crito, because Crito knows that he will loose a friend if Socrates is put to death. Crito has strong determination in trying to get Socrates to escape from prison, and flee the city in search of a new life, but Socrates holds his position in thus he will not escape and will willingly be put to death for the crimes he has committed.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on the other hand, feels that the segregation laws that the black people had to abide by were unjust laws, and the blacks were discriminated upon. When these same blacks wanted to have demonstrations to help remove the desegregation laws, they were asked ultimately to wait. While Dr. King was in prison for non-violent demonstrations, he had some time to compile a letter. In Dr. King's letter he states that because of segregation laws being unjust the black man/woman should and will break these so called unjust laws.
I feel that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.