The United States has committed itself to gallantly rid the world of terrorism. This supposed "war on terror" has lead us back to Iraq. Flashback to a decade ago, Iraq attacks Kuwait, we declare war with Iraq, Iraq leaves Kuwait. But this is not the Desert Storm we used to know. The threat is not present. The United States should not attack Iraq. .
The President and the White House would lead us to believe that Iraq is a threat; that they are capable of building and possess weapons of mass destruction. But this not entirely true. Intelligence officials and military experts on Iraq express caution. While many are convinced that Iraq is rebuilding its arsenal, the White House has not publicly offered evidence of a single factory or lab known to be actively producing weapons of mass destruction. On top of this, they have no intention to provide any evidence to their claims. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld says that the US can not wait for arms proof. But is the threat immediate. .
According to studies released by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Iraq does not have the facilities to make enough material for a nuclear weapon by itself and would need foreign help to do so. On top of this, even if they could obtain materials, they would not be able to launch it at a target from any considerable distance.
Whether or not we will eventually have to attack Iraq is not certain, but now is not the time. We should let the weapons inspectors to do there job and wait. The worst choice right now is haste; a pre-emptive attack could do more damage than good.
Iraq as a Threat What is argumentation? ... The threat comes from Iraq." ... Iraq as a threat "The threat comes from Iraq." ... The proposition by Bush is well placed in that it leaves him plenty of room to elaborate on why Iraq is a threat. ... The claim is factual in that later in the speech evidence is brought up supporting the fact that Iraq is a threat. ...
If President Bush had not acted on Iraq, then we would still be under the threat of terror. Furthermore, Iraq would be a threat to the world and the world would not be safe. ... Thanks to Bush's war in Iraq, the world is safe from the threat of Iraq. ... He is a threat to the world; he is a threat to Iraq. He is a threat to you and Me. ...
The 31-nation military moved against Iraq, commanded by U.S. general H. ... Iraq agreed on February 27-28 to accept the United Nation's terms. ... To the US and other countries not directly involved with Iraq, it is viewed that Iraq is trying to control the world's oil supply. Since it appears that Iraq is a threat to everyone, all the nations involved take measures to alleviate the threat. ... However, I do feel that for whatever reasons, the US was justified in acting to stop the threat from spreading further....
I have decided to write about the pending crisis in Iraq for this assignment. ... He stated that The Iraqi leader is a major threat to the world. ... This threat of military action brought about mixed feelings from the American people, as well as world wide. ... Pluralists in America have determined that this action has nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction, but rather as a threat to Iraq not to limit the export of, or raise the price of our oil. ... We have the evidence, and Saddam has continuously been a threat to peace world wide. ...
The two invading countries aim to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction, which will result in freeing the Iraqi people and lessen the worldwide threat of terrorism. ... President Bush and Prime Minister Blair will not sit back and wait for the potential threat of terrorism that Saddam Hussein poses. ... Bush and Blair will invade Iraq and stop the regime from using their weapons of mass destruction, which therefore rids the threat of terrorism that Iraq poses to the U.S. and other democratic countries. ... They say that Iraq poses no threat because weapons of mass destruction were ...
These actions of evil refer to all of the policies that Iraq believed in that posed a threat to our way of life and a threat to Democracy as we know it. ... It is countries like these that pose a threat to Americans which is why we are acting against them. ... This country was Iraq. ... Our point is that weather or not Saddam was building weapons of mass destruction, he has proven over and over that he is a threat to the United States. His threat just became more apparent with the attacks of September 11th. ...
Saddam is not only a threat to the United States, but to the world as well. ... Iraq has not complied until recently. ... Iraq has also been found to export supplies out of Iraq while at the same time claiming the people are starving. ... Iraq still uses methods such as torture, executions, forced displacement, and repression against the Iraqi people. ... He is a threat to the people of the world. ...
America invaded Iraq for oil. Was the Bush administration's push for war with Iraq motivated by their desire to gain control of Iraq's oil reserves? ... Under the former Iraqi regime the big U.S oil firms were barred from Iraq by U.N sanctions. ... Initially, we were told by the Bush administration that Iraq posed a threat to the safety and security of the United States. ... Former Defence Sectary Madeline Albright believes that their was no reason to go to war with Iraq as Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction and he was not threat to world security, she described ...
In order to be considered a credible threat, you must back up your assertions with actions. Here we will look at two actions the U.S. has recently taken that would cause Iraq to consider their threats of invasion credible. ... This would allow the U.S. to enter Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq and open a second front against Iraqi government forces in the event of a war. ... Truman and USS Theodore Roosevelt are in the eastern Mediterranean, within striking range of Iraq. ... s plan, I see that action and the mass movement of aircraft carriers to the Middle East as establishing credibility...