110) in the sense that the person can live under the laws that eligio. I believe that here she is where is autonomia associative, the freedom to form decisive groups to maximize his autodeterminacio'n. (Dahl, pg. 111). In this, the decisions are solved by the majority, but in this three aspects are created that are discussed much by Dahl. In the first place, it can be that the majority wins, but the minority loses its vote and not viviria in autogobernancia. Secondly, as soon as more majority alla, ma's will extend the freedom of self-determination. (Dahl, pg. the 112) and unamimity leaves here like one the best principles. But when taking the unamimity perderia the principle of the majority. Thirdly, in real democracies, nonideal, las minorities govern to the majorities. and [ ] freedom of self-determination. is denied to him. to most of the town. (Dahl, pg. 112). In my opinion, which Dahl this trying to say here is that those that estan directly in the government (camara of deputies and senators, etc) are the minority and often they do not put attention to the necessities of the majority (the town). An example of this, I believe that I could be what passage at the beginning of this year when camara of deputies and senators decided the new fiscal reform, this affection much to the majority. The democracy is a desirable regime because es a political process [ in where ] people can satisfy its hunger to the maximum. (Dahl, pg. 116). Aqui I think that if this justification for the ideal democracy can be possible, but in a real democracy we are (depending on which country we spoke) a little far from which our government gets to satisfy our desires. To the equal one, if they are possible to be satisfied by the rights, I interest and opportunities that offer the democracy since there is freedom of expression, associative autonomy, etc. But aqui we asked ourselves. who has to govern. (Dahl, pg. 118).