This situation .
is the same with moral rules. Without understanding the rules, we may .
come to think of it as a mark of virtue that we will not consider .
making exceptions to. We need a way of understanding the morality .
against killing. The point is not to preserve every living thing .
possible, but to protect the interests of individuals to have the .
right of choice to die.
People who oppose euthanasia have argued constantly doctors .
have often been known to miscalculate or to make mistakes. Death is .
final and irreversible; in some cases doctors have wrongly made .
diagnostic errors during a check-up. Patients being told they have .
cancer or AIDS, by their doctors' mistake, have killed themselves to .
avoid the pain. Gay-Williams, The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia, stated:.
.
"Contemporary medicine has high standards of excellence and a proven .
record of accomplishment, but it does not possess perfect and .
complete knowledge. A mistaken diagnosis is possible. We may believe .
that we are dying of a disease when, as a matter of fact, we may not .
be. . . ." (454) .
.
Williams explains that patients who have been told by their doctors .
they have cancer never actually had it. But there have been so few .
cases reported that these remarks are often considered to be .
speculations. The individual should have been able to continue living .
until he felt the need to be confined to a bed. I cannot disagree .
with the fact that doctors do make mistakes, but they are more correct .
than they are wrong. Let's say that the patient chooses not to die .
but instead takes the medicines his doctor has prescribed for him. In .
doing so the patient is choosing for himself. He's making his own .
decisions; he could see other doctors to see if his illness had not .
been mistakenly presented. Is it not for the individual to decide .
whether she or he wants to live or die? .
.
Those opposing euthanasia have also argued that practicing euthanasia .