Over the years ethical judgments have been justified by numerous mediums. A few of the more popular foundations are consequences, religion, and feelings, just to name a few. Each of these has strong points as well as weak ones.
One acceptable one basis of ethical judgments is the consequences of our actions. Some would argue that it is possible to make an ethical decision by examining the different possible results that will occur from different courses of action. The "right" choice in a decision like this would be one that benefits the greatest number of people to the biggest magnitude. The idea behind this is that we can understand good and bad through states of pleasure and pain. A good act will produce more net pleasure than pain on the other hand a bad act will cause more net pain. This view is an attempt to preserve the meaningfulness of ethics by keeping it objectionable. Problems arise when we must mix pleasure and pain. In this model we must assume that pleasure and pain are both measurable, also that every aspect of the decision is taken into account. In addition there is a problem with deciding on what ends one ought to have. For instance what may justify an act for one person ma!.
y not be acceptable to another. A single example of this type of reasoning in today's society is with the use of mandatory vaccinations. Every year a few of the people required to take the vaccine die but the majority of people benefit from them making the net result positive. When the feelings of the dead and those left behind to grieve are thought about the sacrifice to them was much greater than to the rest of the public.
Religion is another platform that ethical judgments are put upon. Religion provides a set of guidelines that one should live their life by. One illustration of this is Christianity and the Ten Commandments. There are loads of similarities between religions throughout the world in the values that they hold and what they view as wrong.
It is the guideline for an ethical egoist. ... People who follow this rule are ethical egoists. ... Altruists are the opposite of ethical egoists. ... This individual uses emotion to a greater extent then the ethical egoist. ... Ethical egoists and altruists use emotion to help them make moral judgments. ...
And if so, what ethical considerations? The statement, "The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility,"" does hold some validity as most people would agree with this statement however some skeptics might argue that not all the knowledge brings with it ethical responsibilities. ... There will always be some information that requires more ethical responsibilities than others. ... Our own personal values are determined by the culture we grew up in and our moral judgments and values are just our natural outlooks brought upon by the society and culture in which we were brought up in...
Ethical dilemmas are those situations in which as Susca (2006) states "there is a choice to make between two options and neither option solves the situation at hand in an ethically acceptable manner". In such a scenario, the person choosing has to rely on his personal ethical guidelines or the societal guidelines in order to come up with a satisfactory guideline. ... Here are cases of ethical dilemmas. ... The doctors need to be professionals, and their professional judgment may be needed in such cases where the patients' health is at risk. ... After all an ethical dilemma is a choice b...
What judgments have I made based on perception alone? ... So are not all judgments made based on perception? ... Now what is the ethical significance of this? There is no ethical significance to creation. No action has ethical significance in and of itself. ...
So that ethical decisions, while not necessarily made any easier, can nevertheless become more consistent and defensible. ... Role of the Ethics Committee Importantly, the ethical decision-making process requires group input. ... Our society prizes the notion of "conscience,"" the ability to make a judgment about the moral content of a given action. ... People's values and opinions differ and, as a result, ethical decisions often involve different perspectives and judgments. ... Reflection is critical to ethical decision-making. ...
Ethical dilemmas involve weighing personal values, beliefs and sense of right and wrong. ... The decision making model that will be utilized to solve this ethical dilemma is the six-step process outline by Purtilo and Doherty (2011) in "Ethical Dimensions in the Health Professions". ... The third step includes utilizing ethical theories and principles in analyzing the problem. An example of an ethical theory that can be applied to this dilemma is Utilitarianism. ... Based from thoughtful reflection, logical judgment and careful scrutiny of the situation utilizing an ethical decision ...
Ethical Theorist: John Stuart Mill John Stuart Mill did not create a system of ethics but rather defended a system created by his father, James Mill, and Jeremy Bentham. ... I feel that this is a very accurate ethical premise and John Stuart Mill's studies reflect this accuracy. ... His utilitarianism uses happiness as the standard for moral judgment. ... He also believes that the happiness of all people was the most solid ethical sentiment. ... Thinking critically about ethical issues (4th edition). ...
In Rachels" The Elements of Moral Philosophy; it states, "Ethical Subjectivism is the idea that our moral opinions are based on our feelings, and nothing more". Ethical Subjectivism is what the topic statement is defining. When you make a moral judgment, such as the following: I disagree with homosexuality; what is your basis for the judgment? ... By using Ethical Subjectivism, it clearly explains why moral judgments are just a branch of your preferences. Ethical Subjectivism is " a theory about the nature of moral judgments. ...