rom 1800 to 1850 territorial expansion tore the United States apart. Territorial expansion itself was not a debated issue. Spurred by the concept of Manifest Destiny, almost everyone believed that America should extend from sea to shining sea and maybe even farther. But it was the issue of the expansion of slavery into the new territories that pitted the North against the South and split our nation apart.
The first real crisis over territorial expansion took place in 1819-1821 over the admission of the state of Missouri. The proposed state of Missouri was the first (beside Louisiana itself) to be carved out of the Louisiana Purchase. It lay out of the jurisdiction of the Northwest Ordinance, which prohibited slavery in the Northwest Territories, and had a long tradition of slavery. Therefore, in 1817 Missouri applied to the Union as a slave state. The extension of slavery so far north and the threat of further expansion of slavery into all new territories of the U.S. created havoc in Congress. In February 1819, Congressman James Tallmadge, from New York, proposed an amendment that would prohibit any new slaves to enter the state and provided that all slave children born after the date of admission would be set free at the age of twenty-five. Tallmadge's gradual emancipation proviso received almost unanimous opposition from Southern Congressmen. The amendment twice passed the North dominated House of Representatives, only to be turned down by the balanced Senate. In December 1819, Maine applied for statehood as a free state. In the end a compromise was reached where Maine would enter the Union as a free state, Missouri would enter the Union as a slave state without restrictions, but in the remaining Louisiana territory slavery would be prohibited north of 36o30' (the Mason-Dixon Line). This is now known as the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise is commonly thought of the beginning of American Sectionalism, although signs were visible long before 1819.
Expansionist Tension From 1800 to 1850 territorial expansion tore the United States apart. Territorial expansion itself was not a debated issue. ... The first real crisis over territorial expansion took place in 1819-1821 over the admission of the state of Missouri. ... The issue of annexation was closely linked to the issue of expansion of slavery. ... From 1800 to 1850 America saw a growth in territorial expansion. ...
Manifest Destiny: American Territorial Expansion - Houston Holdren Manifest Destiny was an ideology that United States expansion into new territories was inevitable and predestined. ... However, starting in the 1800s, there were several issues concerning United States territorial expansion and the inequality of minority groups. ... By examining the issues such as race, religion, and gender between minority groups, one can better understand the history of United States territorial expansion. ... Another key minority group affected by discrimination during the 1800s through territorial expansi...
One of the major reasons for territorial expansion was the American's will to conquer what ever they could. ... Territorial expansion was a must for defence of the nation and to prevent any European involvement in North America. ... The desire for good land and the migration which went hand in hand with this was a driving factor in the territorial expansion. ... So then the government had to move west also, confirming the expansion territorially. ... It was their drive and their confidence, their hunger to take something and make it their own, and to protect that thing even if i...
"Examine the reasons of the territorial expansion in the first half of the 19th Century" " Almost all people have, at one stage or another in their history felt and expressed the need to extend their territory and also to explain and justify their need both to the world and to themselves." ... We can thus wonder why the USA needed to enlarge its country so dramatically and will therefore analyse the reasons of this territorial expansion. ... First of all, territorial expansion can be explained starting from two main reasons: the explosive population growth and the "restless in...
Question To what extent was the late nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century United States expansionism a continuation of past United States expansionism and to what extent was it a departure? ... Similarly, the Industrial Revolution served as a catalyst for expansion, especially in the late 1800s and early 1900s, by supplying more military goods, sparking a desire for wealth and profit through innovation, and developing new methods for expansion. ... Previous territorial acquisitions in the late 1700s and early 1800s (Treaty of Paris, Louisiana Purchase, etc) stemmed from expansionist...
American Expansion During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the United States pursued an aggressive policy of expansionism, extending its political and economic influence around the globe. ... However, there was many similarities and differences in the American expansionism during those two centuries. ... Each episode of expansion created an intellectual friction between those that supported territorial growth and those in opposition. ... For the sake of expansionism, the Americans risked their lives and their safety in wars. ... On one side of the debate stood those in...
Territorial Expansion of the United States The United States acquired its first piece of land in 1783; this being the 13 colonies that had fought so hard for their independence during the Revolutionary War. ...
Territorial expansion had a large effect on national unity in this period. Territorial expansion boosted national unity between 1800 and 1823, but it degraded national unity between 1824 and 1850. ... The Federalists opposed expansion because they feared that new territories would drain off their New England population and compete with New England economically, which would decrease their potency in America. ... Therefore, the sectionalist Federalists would not have agreed to this treaty because they were emphatically against expansion. ... Backed by President Tyler, pro-expansion Democrats...
The primary cause of the Civil War was not states" rights; the primary causes of the Civil War were the expansion of slavery and sectionalism. ... The issue of states' rights does not qualify as the primary cause of the Civil War because it only created some commotion over tariffs and the rights of territorial governments in the West. ... The last and most bitter controversy of the expansion of slavery was the Kansas- Nebraska Controversy. ... The controversy over states' rights was the rights of the new territorial governments in the West. ... The issue of states' rights for...