2000 presidential voting in United States was a remarkable voting ever in the United States history. Who was going to our next president was all based on one state. The state was Florida. Both democratic and republican parties were too close to each other. They were tying in votes basically. So Florida votes were a big issue to see who was going to be our future president in United States. But Florida is the one who got messed up in their voting system. .
Technology. Technology is making big differences in the world. Most of the time we get all this advance technology we to make our lives easier. To make maintain our time. To make things quicker then human being. Sometimes it meant to create for different reason but turned out different results. Such as nuclear power. It meant to create for make human lives easier then it was before. But it also has some disadvantages.
In year 2000 presidential election in United States of America was a historical election ever in United States. It was historical because of the technology we had in voting system. In my opinion it wasn't strong enough to have it in presidential elections.
.
Computer that has been used in 2000 presidential votes of United States was created by Diebold Company. It's a computer company. Its known by the entire world. They created this new computer which helped us to vote for the presidential vote in 2000. It's a touch screen computer and here is a picture of it:.
.
It's a network kind of computer. All you have to do is touch the screen choose who you want to vote for. But the thing is no one can't go back. Once we click who we want to vote for we can not go back and change our minds. Lets say if we wanted to vote for democrats and our finger slipped and we vote for republican that records whatever we clicked on the computer. This is hard for many of us. Many of us are not used to all this modern technology.
Electronic Voting Everyone believes that the way we vote with punch cards will definitely change. ... Electronic voting would make voting much easier. ... Electronic voting would take away the possibility of human error. ... There would be no interpretation with electronic voting. ... Electronic voting could even go on-line. ...
They claim that the Voting Rights Act lost the moral clarity that it once had in the 1960s. The main conflict within the Voting Rights Act is whether or not the right to vote was included with the right to representation. ... Districting and other voting-related changes became subject to federal veto if discrimination was suspected. ... It asked the courts to measure electoral inequality in voting districts. ... They believe it to promote racial separatism and assume that all blacks think (and vote) alike. ...
One rationale for online voting is found in the convenience it brings to the voting experience. ... People with disabilities may prefer online voting over traditional, in-person voting or voting with the assistance of technology in the voting place. ... Electronic voting machines and vote-by-mail have vulnerabilities of their own, however, and for some voters, the benefits of online voting may already outweigh the risks. ... Online voting is a less visible method of voting and more difficult to understand. ... The two important concepts of having equal voting power are that only eligible voter...
1965 Voting Rights Act was the foremost event in the history. ... In addition, it is also about the people who were in the Voting Rights Act and their struggles to get right to vote. ... The Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits discrimination of the black people in voting practices. ... Johnson sent the voting rights bill to congress. ... In conclusion, Voting Rights Act in 1965 was the chief event for the black majority people for their vote to rights. ...
To understand the importance of voting it might be easier to understand the suffering that went into allowing all Americans to vote equally. ... Women and minorities had to fight hard to win their right to vote. For instance, African-Americans waited a long painful trial to vote. ... That statement is absurd, just as the thought of not voting. ... The only way to prevent this is by voting. ...
"Women's Voting Rights" This year I have taken part in a social studies unit on the history of voting rights. ...
Many states, North and South, required payment of poll taxes, property ownership, or literacy as a condition of voting. ... Since few blacks had been qualified to vote prior to that date, this exemption applied exclusively to whites. ... Before the passage of the Act, only 383 African-Americans of voting age, out of approximately 15,000, were registered to vote in Dallas County, Alabama. In the three months following the enactment of the Voting Rights Act, 8000 African-Americans were registered. ... In 1965, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act. ...
To some voting may be a waste of time, many seem to think that there vote doesn't count, others think that it is the civic duty to cast their vote, makes them a responsible citizen. ... Even those that do vote, are we voting just because it makes us a responsible citizen? ... I my self had once pondered the thought of not voting. Asking the same question, if I vote would my vote really count? ... The only vote that doesn't count is a vote that is not counted. ...
This requirement effectively prevented many working-class men from voting. ... Furthermore, British law continued to exclude women from voting. ... Gladstone pushed through a reform bill that extended voting rights still further. ... Disraeli argued in favor of women's voting rights in a speech before the House of Commons in 1866 and he also argued that a woman could be a queen and could own land and should be able to vote. ... Then the Parliament granted the vote to women over the age of 30 and they had the right to vote on the same basis as men. ...