Currently, not everyone is devoted to any one religion or any religion at all; but being knowledgeable in this field gives you a better understanding of how to be a better person.
Now the question is "Should schools educate students according to this idea of a full education?" I don't think schools need to change a thing. The resources are open to almost all students. There are many sports teams through the school or through local townships. The same goes for clubs; clubs can cover a whole range of different topics and activities all of which can add to your education. Churches are always willing to take anyone into their community. I believe that schools do their fair share to educate students in what is necessary to be successful economically, which in today's society is more important than other aspects of a full education. The only problem is getting students to take advantage of these resources. Students need to be encouraged by schools to be more open minded and willing to explore new things. .
To deviate a little from a full education, I would like to explain the fundaments of how the actual learning process should work. I have previously mentioned that schools do not need to change a thing, and mainly the same thing goes for the learning process. The most important of successfully transferring knowledge to a student is through social interaction. Through peers, mentors, teachers, and everyone, for this matter, a student should actively engage in conversation and interaction with others to most effectively learn. Learning is a two sided effort with a teacher, for example, explaining the information and a student actively participating and questioning just as much as the teacher. It is this interaction that schools need to achieve to successfully teach its students and have the students retain the knowledge they were just taught.
On the more general scope of things, the University of Iowa's Tippie College of Business tries to produce a person capable of rising to the top in today's economy.